Premium
Spatial and temporal distribution of fish and zooplankton in a shallow lake
Author(s) -
Romare Pia,
Berg Søren,
Lauridsen Torben,
Jeppesen Erik
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
freshwater biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.297
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1365-2427
pISSN - 0046-5070
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01081.x
Subject(s) - pelagic zone , zooplankton , rutilus , perch , abundance (ecology) , ecology , planktivore , spatial distribution , vegetation (pathology) , biology , habitat , environmental science , fishery , geography , fish <actinopterygii> , phytoplankton , medicine , remote sensing , pathology , nutrient
Summary 1. We performed both a large‐ and a small‐scale echo sounding study on the spatial and temporal distribution of fish (mainly roach, Rutilus rutilus and perch, Perca fluviatlis ), as well as a small‐scale study of zooplankton distribution in the small, shallow and eutrophic Lake Hanebjerg in Denmark. In the small‐scale study, sampling was conducted in open water as well as in the edge zone immediately outside two different types of vegetation. 2. Fish daytime abundances differed between the northern and the southern parts of the lake and, on a small scale, small fish aggregated in the edge zones during day, preferably outside dense emergent vegetation. Copepods avoided emergent vegetation, while cladocerans showed no habitat preference. Both small fish and cladoceran numbers were found to be higher during night than day. 3. The relative abundance (number per sample) of cladocerans in the edge zone immediately outside vegetation was negatively correlated with the relative abundance of fish in that zone. There was no correlation between cladoceran and fish abundance in open water, or between the relative abundance of copepods and fish. 4. The presence of pelagic piscivores in combination with avoidance behaviour of both fish and zooplankton is a likely explanation for the observed distribution of small fish and cladocerans in Lake Hanebjerg. Both small‐ and large‐scale distribution patterns may be dependent on the type and distribution of complex structure in the lake. Even in a small lake, large‐scale patterns may affect the interpretation of small‐scale data.