Premium
Minimal models of top‐down control of phytoplankton
Author(s) -
Scheffer Marten,
Rinaldi Sergio
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
freshwater biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.297
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1365-2427
pISSN - 0046-5070
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2000.00674.x
Subject(s) - daphnia , plankton , zooplankton , phytoplankton , biology , ecology , biomass (ecology) , dominance (genetics) , algal bloom , cladocera , predation , nutrient , biochemistry , gene
1. A set of models describing the dynamics of top‐down control of phytoplankton by Daphnia in lakes is reviewed. The basis of these models is a simple and well‐known model that has been used, among other things, to demonstrate the paradox of enrichment.
2. We discuss minimal extensions that allow this model to mimic the effects of spatial heterogeneity, planktivory, seasonality and inedible algae.
3. These models generate hypotheses about mechanisms that may cause patterns observed in the field such as:• Spatial heterogeneity stabilizes plankton dynamics, and causes enrichment to result in a gradual increase of both zooplankton and algal biomass. • Daphnia populations can collapse at a threshold level of predation pressure from fish, rather than gradually become less abundant. • Absence of Daphnia in summer may typically be caused by the combination of food shortage followed by suppression by fish. • The spring clear‐water phase and various other aspects of the typical seasonal dynamics of Daphnia and algal biomass can simply be explained from the seasonal rise and fall of rates of biological processes and the reproduction cycle of fish. • Depending on the conditions, cyanobacterial dominance can be stimulated but also suppressed by Daphnia .4. We discuss the way in which such very simple models may contribute to the building of theories about plankton dynamics in the field, and the caveats of interpreting wrongly the message from models.