Premium
Production of benthic macroinvertebrate communities along a southern Appalachian river continuum
Author(s) -
GRUBAUGH JACK,
WALLACE BRUCE,
HOUSTON ELIZABETH
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
freshwater biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.297
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1365-2427
pISSN - 0046-5070
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.d01-578.x
Subject(s) - cobble , benthic zone , habitat , ecology , environmental science , river ecosystem , hydrology (agriculture) , bedrock , periphyton , biomass (ecology) , geology , biology , geomorphology , geotechnical engineering
1. Annual production was estimated for macroinvertebrate communities of principle habitats along a first‐ to seventh‐order river continuum in the southern Appalachian Mountains (U.S.A.). Annual production was relatively low in depositional habitats, pebble/gravel substrata, and on cobble devoid of plant biomass (mosses and hydrophytes). Production was greater in bedrock habitats and greatest on hydrophyte‐covered cobble, with estimates reaching 364 g AFDM (ash‐free dry mass)m –2 yr –1 in a sixth‐order river reach. Annual production in depositional habitats was correlated to standing crops of benthic organic material (BOM) in low‐order stream reaches but not in higher‐order reaches, indicating differences in BOM availability with stream size. In cobble, pebble/gravel and bedrock habitats production was significantly correlated to standing crops of aquatic plants, which can stabilize substrata and enhance access of collector‐filtering invertebrates to entrained food resources. 2. By accounting for proportional availability of habitats along the continuum, estimates of total production ranged from 5 to 154 g AFDM m –2 yr –1 , and increased significantly with stream size. Annual production estimated for sixth‐ and seventh‐order reaches of the continuum were amongst the highest reported thus far for lotic systems. Organization of the benthic community along the continuum, based on production estimates for individual functional feeding‐groups, generally supported predictions of the River Continuum Concept (RCC): shredder contributions were greatest in low‐order reaches and declined downstream; scraper percentages were greatest in the middle of the continuum; collector‐filterer contributions increased with increasing stream size. Longitudinal trends for collector‐gatherers and predators did not support RCC predictions; these groups appeared to be influenced by localized changes in habitat availability and occurrence of vertebrate predators along the continuum.