Premium
Implications of interannual variability in euphausiid population biology for fish production along the south‐west coast of Vancouver Island: a synthesis
Author(s) -
Tanasichuk R. W.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
fisheries oceanography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.016
H-Index - 80
eISSN - 1365-2419
pISSN - 1054-6006
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2419.2002.00185.x
Subject(s) - biology , krill , euphausia , upwelling , population , fishery , abundance (ecology) , productivity , biomass (ecology) , merluccius , oceanography , fish <actinopterygii> , ecology , hake , demography , macroeconomics , sociology , economics , geology
This is a synthesis of published and unpublished research on euphausiid and fish populations using the south‐west coast of Vancouver Island. Overall, the studies covered 1985–98, when there were two ENSO events and considerable variation in upwelling. The population biology of the dominant euphausiids ( Thysanoessa spinifera , Euphausia pacifica ) was monitored during 1991–98. The species abundance trends differed. Results of simple correlation analyses suggested that variations in temperature, salinity and upwelling do not explain variations in the abundance of larval or adult euphausiids, or in the abundance of portions of euphausiid populations on which fish feed. I found significant interannual variations in daily ration of the dominant planktivorous fish species, but euphausiids remained the most important prey. Pacific hake ( Merluccius productus ), the dominant planktivore, fed on larger (>17 mm) T. spinifera , even though the biomass of this part of the euphausiid biomass decreased by 75% between 1991 and 1997, but Pacific herring ( Clupea pallasi ) may have begun feeding on smaller E. pacifica . Therefore, any study of the relationship between fish production and krill biology must consider that part of the euphausiid biomass exploited by fish. In addition, some fish species and/or life history stages appeared to adapt to changes in euphausiid availability, while others did not. Such variation in adaptations also has to be described and considered to understand how changes in euphausiid biology affect fish productivity.