Premium
Application of a two‐dimensional model to simulate flow and transport in a macroporous agricultural soil with tile drains
Author(s) -
Abbaspour K. C.,
Kohler A.,
Simunek J.,
Fritsch M.,
Schulin R.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
european journal of soil science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.244
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1365-2389
pISSN - 1351-0754
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2001.00389.x
Subject(s) - macropore , tile drainage , flow (mathematics) , environmental science , tracer , hydrology (agriculture) , soil water , head (geology) , water table , water flow , soil science , geotechnical engineering , groundwater , geology , mechanics , chemistry , geomorphology , mesoporous material , biochemistry , physics , nuclear physics , catalysis
Summary It is essential that important field processes are taken into account to model water flow and chemical transport accurately in agricultural fields. Recent field studies indicate that transport through macropores can play a major role in the export of solutes and particulates from drained agricultural land into surface water. Non‐ideal drain behaviour may further modify the flow and transport. We extended an existing two‐dimensional flow and transport model for variably saturated soils (SWMS_2D) by adding a macropore domain and an additional Hooghoudt drain boundary condition. The Hooghoudt boundary condition accounts for an entrance head needed to initiate flow into the drains. This paper presents the application of the new model (M‐2D) to an agricultural field in Switzerland. To understand interactions between macropore flow and drains better we simulated water flow and bromide transport for four different field scenarios. We considered both collector drains only with an ideal drain boundary condition (with and without macropores) and collectors and laterals with a Hooghoudt boundary condition (also with and without macropores). For each scenario, inverse modelling was used to identify model parameters using 150 days of data on observed cumulative discharge, water table depth, and tracer concentration. The models were subsequently tested against a 390‐day validation data set. We found that the two additional components (macropore flow, drain entrance head) of the M‐2D model were essential to describe adequately the flow regime and the tracer transport data in the field.