Premium
Soil moisture monitoring at the field scale using automatic capacitance probes
Author(s) -
CHANZY A.,
CHADOEUF J.,
GAUDU J. C.,
MOHRATH D.,
RICHARD G.,
BRUCKLER L.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
european journal of soil science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.244
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1365-2389
pISSN - 1351-0754
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2389.1998.4940637.x
Subject(s) - replicate , gravimetric analysis , water content , moisture , soil science , capacitance , calibration , standard deviation , environmental science , capacitance probe , remote sensing , hydrology (agriculture) , materials science , chemistry , mathematics , geotechnical engineering , geology , statistics , composite material , organic chemistry , electrode
Summary The capacitance probe is an attractive device for monitoring soil moisture automatically. However, its sphere of influence is rather small (a few cubic centimetres only). We have analysed the possibility of monitoring moisture at the field scale using only a few probes (≤3). We calibrated each probe by establishing a direct relation between the field average soil moisture θ f and the signal given by the probe. As in earlier studies, we found that a linear relation is generally suitable. A classical statistical analysis was performed to assess the error of a single probe. When replicate probes were installed, we obtained replicate estimates of θ f . We proposed an estimator θ f that combines all replications optimally. Three experiments each lasting several months were carried out on bare tilled fields to evaluate the probe against gravimetric measurements. Our results show that the calibrations differ significantly from one probe to another. Once calibrated, the capacitance probe provided accurate soil moisture measurements (70% of the calibration relations had residual standard deviations < 0.02m 3 m −3 ), but it is advisable to have at least two replicate probes. Soil water storage was well estimated by combining four to seven probes to establish the moisture profile, despite the error induced by each probe. Moreover, the temporal variations in water storage were accurately measured by the probes. We found an error of 0.6 mm day −1 (standard deviation) in daily variation of the water storage, which partly involved the error made on the reference measurements (gravimetric method).