Premium
Quantitative, phenotypic, and functional evaluation of basophils in myelodysplastic syndromes
Author(s) -
Füreder W.,
Schernthaner G.H.,
Ghannadan M.,
Hauswirth A.,
Sperr W. R.,
Semper H.,
Majlesi Y.,
Zwirner J.,
Götze O.,
Bühring H.J.,
Lechner K.,
Valent P.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
european journal of clinical investigation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.164
H-Index - 107
eISSN - 1365-2362
pISSN - 0014-2972
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2362.2001.00887.x
Subject(s) - immunology , myelodysplastic syndromes , cytopenia , medicine , cd59 , immunoglobulin e , basophil , myeloid , endocrinology , complement system , immune system , antibody , bone marrow
Background The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a group of clonal haematological disorders characterized by cytopenia(s), reduced differentiation‐capacity of myeloid cells, and impaired leukocyte function. However, little is known so far about basophil granulocytes in MDS. Design We have compared the numbers, phenotype and function of basophils in MDS patients with those in healthy subjects. A total numer of 23 patients with MDS (refractory anaemia, n = 8; refractory anaemia with ringsideroblasts, n = 7; refractory anaemia with excess of blasts/refractory anaemia with excess of blasts in transformation, n = 8) and 20 healthy donors were included. Results The numbers of blood basophils in MDS patients (34·6 ± 62·9 μL −1 ) was lower compared to healthy controls (58·6 ± 64·9 μL −1 ). Correspondingly, whole blood histamine levels were lower in MDS patients (MDS 34·1 ± 29·1 ng mL −1 vs. normal donors 72·0 ± 36·9 ng mL −1 ). Like ‘normal’ basophils, basophils in MDS expressed interleukin‐3 receptor α (CD123), E‐NPP3 (CD203c), CR1 (CD35), CR3 (CD11b), CR4 (CD11c), membrane co‐factor protein (CD46), decay‐accelerating factor (CD55) and membrane attack complex inhibitory factor (CD59), as well as receptors for C3a, C5a (CD88), and IgE. Recombinant human (rh) C5a and anti‐IgE induced significant release of histamine from basophils in both groups of donors without significant differences between MDS and healthy controls. Conclusions The absolute numbers of basophils in MDS patients are lower than in normal donors. However, basophils in MDS do not differ from their ‘normal counterparts’ in terms of complement receptor expression, IgE‐receptor expression, or functional responses to respective ligands.