z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The laryngeal mask airway in fresh cadavers versus paralysed anaesthetized patients: ease of insertion, airway sealing pressure, intracuff pressures and anatomic position
Author(s) -
Brimacombe J.,
Keller C.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
european journal of anaesthesiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.445
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1365-2346
pISSN - 0265-0215
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2346.1999.00568.x
Subject(s) - medicine , airway , laryngeal mask airway , cadaver , anesthesia , mascara , larynx , laryngeal masks , anatomy
Summary We compared the performance of the size 5 laryngeal mask airway in 20 paralysed anaesthetized male patients and 20 male cadavers (6–24 h post‐mortem). Groups were matched for height and weight. Airway sealing pressure, in vivo intracuff pressure and anatomical position (judged fibre‐optically) were documented at zero volume and after each additional 10 mL up to 40 mL. All laryngeal mask airways were inserted at the first attempt and insertion times were similar. There were no differences in airway sealing pressure, in vivo intracuff pressure or fibre‐optic position between the groups. We conclude that the performance of the laryngeal mask airway is similar for fresh cadavers and paralysed anaesthetized patients. This may have implications for laryngeal mask airway research and training.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here