Premium
Between‐forest variation in vertical stratification of drosophilid populations
Author(s) -
Tanabe ShinIchi
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
ecological entomology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.865
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1365-2311
pISSN - 0307-6946
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2311.2002.00469.x
Subject(s) - stratification (seeds) , canopy , old growth forest , biology , ecology , secondary forest , tree canopy , spatial distribution , range (aeronautics) , spatial ecology , abundance (ecology) , geography , botany , seed dormancy , germination , remote sensing , materials science , dormancy , composite material
1. The spatial distribution pattern of forest‐dwelling drosophilid flies was compared among species and among four forests with markedly different vertical foliage structures, including secondary and primary forests, with special reference to vertical stratification. 2. All 20 drosophilid species analysed showed vertically stratified distribution patterns, which were detected statistically in at least one forest site during the 2‐year study period. As a whole, the vertical distribution patterns were stable, with or without stratification, over the 2 years. 3. The ratio of species with stratified distribution to the total number of species changed in a similar trend with the vertical foliage complexity of forests, both showing a large gap between secondary and primary forests, even for species common to all four forests. 4. Many species, most of which were tree‐sap feeders, showed highly predictable patterns of vertical stratification across forests and years. This was associated strongly with regular preference for microhabitat, mostly for the canopy, suggesting that the unvarying nature of canopy environments in any forest is very important in producing, maintaining, and promoting the vertical stratification in organism abundance, and contributes to the ubiquity of the pattern. 5. Some species with a wider range of food resources than other species, most of which showed no clear preference for the canopy, were characterised by large between‐forest differences in vertical distribution patterns and tended to show non‐stratified patterns in secondary forests, contributing to the lower ratio of species with stratified distribution in the two secondary forests than in the primary forests. 6. The role of forest structure in organising the environment is discussed; it is suggested that vertical complexity of foliage structure affects the prevalence of vertical stratification in animal communities indirectly through the vertical heterogeneity of environmental conditions.