Premium
Seasonal variation in freezing tolerance of the New Zealand alpine cockroach Celatoblatta quinquemaculata
Author(s) -
SINCLAIR BRENT
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
ecological entomology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.865
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1365-2311
pISSN - 0307-6946
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2311.1997.00087.x
Subject(s) - supercooling , cockroach , hardiness (plants) , freezing point , snow , schist , biology , ecology , geology , horticulture , meteorology , geomorphology , geography , metamorphic rock , paleontology , physics , cultivar , thermodynamics
1. The cold hardiness of the alpine cockroach Celatoblatta quinquemaculata was investigated. This species is found at 1360 m a.s.l. beneath schist slabs on the Rock and Pillar Range (Central Otago, New Zealand). Cockroaches were collected monthly from January to December 1996, and their LT 50 and supercooling points determined. 2. Celatoblatta quinquemaculata was freezing tolerant throughout the year, with a lower lethal temperature in winter of – 8.9 °C. Celatoblatta quinquemaculata was also found frozen under rocks in the field when the under‐rock temperature was below – 3 °C, and could survive being frozen at – 5 °C for 4 days in the laboratory. 3. There was a marked decrease in LT 50 temperature from – 5.5 °C in April to – 7.5 °C in May. This coincides with decreasing temperatures from summer through autumn to winter, during which temperatures beneath snow‐covered rocks may reach – 7.3 °C. 4. Supercooling points fluctuated during the year, with an increase from – 4.2 °C in autumn to – 3.4 °C in winter. Supercooling point was highest in spring, and changes in supercooling point do not appear to be related to changes in LT 50 . 5. Recordings of environmental temperatures from the Rock and Pillar Range suggest that cockroaches may undergo up to twenty‐three freeze–thaw cycles in the coldest month of the year, and that they may remain frozen for periods of up to 21 h. Maximum cooling rates recorded in the field (0.01 °C min –1 ) were 100‐fold slower than laboratory cooling rates, so survival estimates from laboratory experiments may be underestimates.