Premium
Posters. P20 Fine needle aspiration of salivary glands in Beaumont Hospital: a 14‐year audit
Author(s) -
Mulligan A. M.,
O'Shea A. M.,
Royston D.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
cytopathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.512
H-Index - 48
eISSN - 1365-2303
pISSN - 0956-5507
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2303.14.s1.1_36.x
Subject(s) - medicine , mucoepidermoid carcinoma , fine needle aspiration , salivary gland , pleomorphic adenoma , cyst , lymphoma , carcinoma , biopsy , pathology , radiology
Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is a well‐established diagnostic technique which is frequently used to diagnose head and neck neoplasms. Clinical decisions concerning treatment of malignant salivary gland tumours, the extent of surgery and advisability of pre‐operative irradiation can be helped by prior knowledge of tumour type. Aim The aim of this study was to do an audit of all salivary gland FNAs carried out in Beaumont Hospital over a 14‐year period. Methods All salivary gland FNAs between 1989 and 2002 were reviewed. Where available, the corresponding follow‐up histological specimens were studied. Results During this 14‐year period, 305 patients with salivary gland lesions had FNA of the lesion performed. The total number of aspirates performed was 343. Of these, 184 had histologies available for follow‐up. Eighty‐nine aspirates were reported as inadequate; 89 as inflammatory, normal or consistent with cyst contents. One hundred and thirteen aspirates were diagnosed as a benign entity. Thirty‐three aspirates were reported as malignant (21 of which were felt to be primary to the salivary gland and 12 metastatic). Sixteen cases were called suspicious. Good correlation between FNA findings and histology was seen in the majority of cases (145 of 183). Some diagnostic problem areas were identified. These included the following: lymphomas (seven called benign on FNA), Warthin's tumour (seven not diagnosed or misdiagnosed on FNA) and mucoepidermoid carcinoma (one reported as pleomorhic adenoma and one as benign/cystic on FNA). Seven pleomorphic adenomas were not diagnosed on FNA pre‐operatively, predominantly due to inadequacy of the specimen. Three other malignancies (acinic cell carcinoma, lymphoepithelial carcinoma and carcinoma ex‐pleomorphic adenoma), while not diagnosed on FNA, were called suspicious, with re‐biopsy advised. Conclusion FNA cytology of salivary glands is an accurate method for evaluation of both benign and malignant lesions, enabling optimum surgical and adjuvant therapy decision‐making pre‐operatively. Well‐defined problem areas are identified and, therefore, clinicopathological correlation is required in these cases.