Premium
Guest Lecture
8.45–9.30 Monday 15 September 2003
Endocervical Adenocarcinoma and its Precursors
Author(s) -
McCluggage W. G.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
cytopathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.512
H-Index - 48
eISSN - 1365-2303
pISSN - 0956-5507
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2303.14.s1.1_1.x
Subject(s) - medicine , dysplasia , adenocarcinoma , malignant transformation , cervix , lesion , squamous intraepithelial lesion , pathology , incidence (geometry) , malignancy , cervical intraepithelial neoplasia , cervical cancer , cancer , physics , optics
The incidence of malignant and pre‐malignant endocervical glandular lesions is increasing. Part of this is an apparent increase due to a reduction in the number of invasive cervical squamous carcinomas but there is evidence that there is a real increase in malignant and pre‐malignant endocervical glandular lesions. Different terminologies are in use in the UK where the term cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN) is commonly used and the rest of the world where pre‐malignant lesions are classified as glandular dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) (WHO classification). It is well established that high‐grade CGIN (AIS in WHO terminology) is a precursor lesion of cervical adenocarcinoma but it is controversial whether a recognizable precursor to high grade CGIN (namely low‐grade CGIN) exists and criteria for diagnosing this are poorly established and poorly reproducible. Most cases of CGIN are of usual or endocervical type but other morphological subtypes described include endometrioid, intestinal, tubal and stratified mucinous intraepithelial lesion (SMILE). The presence of skip lesions and lesions high up the endocervical canal has been overemphasised in CGIN with most cases occurring close to the transformation zone. Treatment is on an individualized basis but local excision with negative margins and close cytological follow‐up may be employed. There is evidence in the literature that early invasive adenocarcinomas behave in a similar fashion to early invasive squamous carcinomas and that, on selected occasions, conservative therapy can be safely undertaken. However, further studies are needed to ascertain the behaviour and natural history of early invasive cervical adenocarcinoma. In 10%–15% of cases it may be impossible to ascertain whether a malignant endocervical glandular lesion is invasive or in situ . There are many benign mimics of CGIN and adenocarcinoma, including tuboendometrial metaplasia (TEM), endometriosis and microglandular hyperplasia (MGH). Although careful morphological examination usually allows confident distinction of these lesions, a panel of immunohistochemical stains including MIB1, bcl2 and p16 may assist.