Premium
Comparison between two common methods for reporting cold and diarrhoea symptoms of children in daycare centre research
Author(s) -
Carabin H,
Gyorkos T W,
Soto J C,
Joseph L,
Collet JP
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
child: care, health and development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.832
H-Index - 82
eISSN - 1365-2214
pISSN - 0305-1862
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2214.2000.00168.x
Subject(s) - medicine , incidence (geometry) , common cold , pediatrics , diarrhea , family medicine , diarrhoeal disease , demography , immunology , sociology , physics , optics
Summary Background The increasing number of children attending day care centres (DCCs) in industrialized countries has refocused attention on the occurrence of infections and infectious diseases in these settings. Objective To evaluate the agreement between two methods (parent method vs. educator method) for reporting the occurrence of respiratory and diarrhoeal infections. Methods Fifty‐two DCCs in Québec, Canada, participated. Both educators and parents were invited to fill in calendars on which they would indicate the occurrence of colds and diarrhoea. For the parents' method, parents were telephoned biweekly to record their calendar information. For the educators' method, educators returned their calendar pages monthly (following prompting by phone, when necessary). Results Three hundred and thirty‐three parents of toddlers participated in the 15‐month reporting period between September 1996 and November 1997. The average agreement between the two methods was low (13.5% for colds and 9.8% for diarrhoea). Overall estimates of the incidence rates of respiratory and diarrhoeal infections based on parents' method were higher than those based on educators' method. Conclusions Parents' data lead to larger estimations of incidence rates and are probably more valid than educators' data.