Premium
Pharmacokinetics, food intake requirements and tolerability of once‐daily combinations of nelfinavir and low‐dose ritonavir in healthy volunteers
Author(s) -
Aarnoutse R. E.,
Droste J. A. H.,
Van Oosterhout J. J. G.,
Koopmans P. P.,
Popescu M.,
Reiss P.,
Hekster Y. A.,
Burger D. M.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
british journal of clinical pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.216
H-Index - 146
eISSN - 1365-2125
pISSN - 0306-5251
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01756.x
Subject(s) - nelfinavir , cmin , ritonavir , pharmacokinetics , tolerability , pharmacology , medicine , regimen , cmax , adverse effect , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , viral load , immunology , antiretroviral therapy
Aims This study was performed to evaluate the steady‐state pharmacokinetics, food intake requirements and short‐term tolerability of once‐daily combinations of nelfinavir and low‐dose ritonavir. Methods Twenty‐seven healthy volunteers were randomized over three groups to receive a once‐daily regimen of nelfinavir/ritonavir 2000/200 mg (group 1), 2000/400 mg (group 2) or 2500/200 mg (group 3) with food for 14 days. Pharmacokinetic parameters for nelfinavir and its active metabolite M8 were assessed on study days 15 and 16, after administration of the regimens with a full (610 kcal) or light (271 kcal) breakfast, respectively. Results Pharmacokinetic data were evaluable for eight volunteers in group 1, eight in group 2 and four in group 3. Administration of nelfinavir/ritonavir with a full breakfast resulted in geometric mean (GM) nelfinavir AUC 24h values of 76.8, 51.3, and 61.9 h*mg/l in group 1, 2 and 3, respectively. GM 24‐h C min concentrations of nelfinavir were 0.76 mg l −1 , 0.43 mg l −1 and 0.47 mg l −1 , respectively. Co‐administration of ritonavir increased M8 concentrations more than nelfinavir concentrations, resulting in GM AUC 24h and C min values for nelfinavir plus M8 that were higher than or comparable to reference values for the approved regimen of nelfinavir (1250 mg BID without ritonavir). In the 2000/200 mg group, seven out of eight subjects had a C min value of nelfinavir plus M8 above a threshold of 1.0 mg l −1 . Administration of the combinations with a light breakfast resulted in significant decreases in the AUC 24h and C min of nelfinavir and nelfinavir plus M8, compared with intake with a full breakfast. For the C min of nelfinavir plus M8, the GM ratio (light/full breakfast) was 0.76 (90% confidence interval 0.67–0.86, participants from all groups combined) . Short‐term tolerability was satisfactory, apart from a higher than expected incidence of mild rash (12%). Conclusions Administration of nelfinavir in a once‐daily regimen appears feasible. A nelfinavir/ritonavir 2000/200 mg combination appears appropriate for further evaluation. Once‐daily nelfinavir/ritonavir should be taken with a meal containing at least 600 kcal.