Premium
Comparison of the vasoconstrictor effects of the selective 5‐HT 1D ‐receptor agonist L‐775,606 with the mixed 5‐HT 1B / 1D ‐receptor agonist sumatriptan and 5‐HT in human isolated coronary artery
Author(s) -
Longmore J.,
Maguire J. J.,
MacLeod A.,
Street L.,
Schofield W. N.,
Hill R. G.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
british journal of clinical pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.216
H-Index - 146
eISSN - 1365-2125
pISSN - 0306-5251
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00129.x
Subject(s) - sumatriptan , agonist , vasoconstriction , receptor , chemistry , contraction (grammar) , medicine , partial agonist , pharmacology , coronary arteries , endocrinology , artery , anesthesia
Aims Vasoconstriction in human coronary artery can be mediated via activation of both 5‐HT 2 and 5‐HT 1B ‐receptors. Coronary vasoconstriction is a rare, but potential adverse effect of the antimigraine drug sumatriptan. In order to investigate the receptor population involved we compared the vasoconstrictor effects of sumatriptan (a mixed 5‐HT 1B/1D ‐receptor agonist) with those of L‐775,606 (a selective 5‐HT 1D ‐receptor agonist) and 5‐HT (the endogenous ligand) in human isolated coronary arteries. Methods Coronary arteries were obtained from human hearts removed prior to transplant surgery. Several endothelium denuded ring segments (4 mm in length) were obtained from each artery and mounted for isometric tension recording. Each segment was first exposed to 45 mm KCl and then to 5‐HT (1 nm‐100 μm ). Concentration‐effect curves to L‐775,606 (1‐(3‐(5‐(1,2,4‐triazol‐4‐yl)‐1H‐indol‐3‐yl)propyl)‐4‐(2‐(3‐fluorophenyl)ethyl)piperazine) and sumatriptan were then performed in a consecutive and random manner. The response to repeated application of 5‐HT was obtained in separate segments. Results Twenty‐five segments from seven different coronary arteries were studied. Concentration‐effect curves were fitted to the data using nonlinear regression analysis. The maximum contraction for L‐775,606 was significantly less than that for sumatriptan with E max values (% relative to 45 mm KCl=100%) of 30.1±4.22 and 41.5±2.7, respectively. L‐775,606 was significantly (30‐fold) less potent than sumatriptan in causing contraction compared with sumatriptan (EC 50 values were 6.0 μm and 0.2 μm, respectively). For comparison the E max value for 5‐HT was 77.2% and the EC 50 value was 0.2 μm. Conclusions The selective 5‐HT 1D ‐receptor agonist L‐775,606 has less propensity towards vasoconstriction in human isolated coronary artery (endothelium‐denuded) than was mixed 5‐HT 1B/1D ‐receptor agonist sumatriptan. The contractions produced were at concentrations where L‐775,606 would be expected to occupy 5‐HT 1B ‐receptors.