Premium
Comparison of the vasorelaxant effect of nitroprusside and nitroglycerin in the human radial artery in vitro
Author(s) -
He GuoWei,
Yang ChengQin
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
british journal of clinical pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.216
H-Index - 146
eISSN - 1365-2125
pISSN - 0306-5251
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00969.x
Subject(s) - sodium nitroprusside , vasodilation , medicine , verapamil , thromboxane a2 , anesthesia , artery , thromboxane , contraction (grammar) , cardiology , pharmacology , calcium , nitric oxide , platelet
Aims In recent years the radial artery (RA) has been re‐introduced for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, the potential for vasospasm remains a clinical problem when this vessel is employed and effective vasodilator agents are required to combat vasospastic events. This in vitro study was designed to compare the vasodilator effects of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and nitroglycerin (NTG) in the human RA.Methods Human RA segments (n=70) were taken from vessels employed for grafting in patients undergoing CABG. Concentration‐relaxation curves for SNP and NTG were established in RA which had been precontracted with various vasoconstrictors (potassium chloride [K + ], the thromboxane A 2 mimetic agent U46619 or endothelin‐1 [ET‐1]).Results Both SNP and NTG caused complete relaxation and EC 50 s were similar except that NTG was 6.2‐fold more potent than SNP in U46619‐induced contraction (−7.50±0.16 vs−6.71±0.38 log m, P=0.04). After treatment with verapamil and NTG solution during harvesting, the RA segments responded with reduced maximal relaxation to NTG (84.9±3.9%, compared with 98.8±0.8% in the control, P=0.004). The vessel became less sensitive to NTG (E C 50 : −6.29±0.4 vs−7.50±0.16 log m, P=0.01). In investigations carried out with SNP, tolerance was only seen in the magnitude of the relaxation (87.4±4.7%vs 99.2±0.6% in the control, P =0.03).Conclusions Both NTG and SNP are potent vasodilators in the RA. NTG may have more potent effects in certain situations (constriction related to thromboxane A 2 ). However, tolerance to NTG may develop. A cross tolerance to SNP may exist but the effect is weak so that SNP may be preferable to NTG as a vasodilator in the RA postoperatively. Other vasodilators may be the drugs of choice under such circumstances.