Premium
A study of the effects of long‐term use on individual sensitivity to temazepam and lorazepam in a clinical population
Author(s) -
Van Steveninck Alfred L.,
Wallnöfer Andreas E.,
Schoemaker Rik C.,
Pieters Monique S. M.,
Danhof Meindert,
Van Gerven Joop M. A.,
Cohen Adam F.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
british journal of clinical pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.216
H-Index - 146
eISSN - 1365-2125
pISSN - 0306-5251
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1997.t01-1-00580.x
Subject(s) - temazepam , lorazepam , benzodiazepine , medicine , anesthesia , population , pharmacokinetics , saccadic masking , pharmacodynamics , pharmacology , eye movement , ophthalmology , receptor , environmental health
Aims The central effects of benzodiazepines may be attenuated after chronic use by changes in pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics or both. This attenuation may be influenced by the dosing pattern and the characteristics of the user population. The objectives of this study were to evaluate drug sensitivity in long‐term users of temazepam and lorazepam in a clinical population. Methods The sensitivity to benzodiazepine effects in chronic users (1–20 years) of lorazepam (n=14) or temazepam (n =13) was evaluated in comparison with age and sex matched controls. Drug sensitivity was evaluated by plasma concentration in relation to saccadic eye movement parameters, postural stability and visual analogue scales. Results Pharmacokinetics of lorazepam and temazepam did not differ between patients and control subjects. Chronic users of lorazepam showed clear evidence of reduced sensitivity, indicated by lack of any pharmacodynamic difference between patients and controls at baseline, when drug concentrations were similar to the peak values attained in the control subjects after administration of 1–2.5 mg of lorazepam. In addition, there was a two‐ to four fold reduction in the slopes of concentration‐effect plots for measures of saccadic eye movements and body sway (all; P ≤0.01). By contrast, sensitivity in chronic users of temazepam was not different from controls. The difference between the temazepam and the lorazepam group appears to be associated with a more continuous drug exposure in the latter, due to the longer half‐life and a more frequent intake of lorazepam. This pattern of use may be partly related to the more anxious personality traits that were observed in the chronic users of lorazepam. Conclusions Chronic users of lorazepam show evidence of tolerance to sedative effects in comparison with healthy controls. Tolerance does not occur in chronic users of temazepam. The difference may be related to pharmacological properties, in addition to different patterns of use, associated with psychological factors.