Premium
Comparison of the effects of a selective muscarinic receptor antagonist and hyoscine (scopolamine) on motion sickness, skin conductance and heart rate
Author(s) -
Golding J. F.,
Stott J. R. R.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
british journal of clinical pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.216
H-Index - 146
eISSN - 1365-2125
pISSN - 0306-5251
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1997.00606.x
Subject(s) - motion sickness , muscarinic acetylcholine receptor , anesthesia , placebo , medicine , crossover study , scopolamine hydrobromide , heart rate , muscarinic antagonist , antagonist , blood pressure , receptor , alternative medicine , pathology , radiology
Aims Hyoscine (scopolamine), which is effective in the prophylaxis of motion sickness, shows similar binding affinities to all of the five known muscarinic receptor sub‐types. The effectiveness of hyoscine was compared with zamifenacin (UK‐76654), which binds selectively to the muscarinic M 3 and m5 receptors. Methods Eighteen subjects received hyoscine hydrobromide 0.6 mg, zamifenacin 20 mg, or placebo (double‐blind cross‐over design). Sessions were 1 week apart and the drug (oral) was given 90 min prior to a motion sickness test. Motion sickness was elicited by cross‐coupled stimulation on a turntable. The rotational velocity was incremented by 2° s −1 every 30 s, and a sequence (seq) of eight head movements of 45° was completed every 30 s. Motion tolerance was assessed as the number of sequences of head movement required to achieve moderate nausea. Pulse rate was recorded before and at 1 and 2 h after drug administration. Skin conductance activity in the frequency band 0.005–0.48 Hz, an index of sweat gland activity, was measured using Ag/AgCl electrodes on the palmar surfaces of fingers and across the forehead. Results Both zamifenacin and hyoscine produced an increase in tolerance to the motion challenge ( P <0.01) with no significant difference between the two drugs (5.0±1.6 vs 5.7±1.6 seqs. respectively, mean±s.e.mean). Compared with placebo or zamifenacin, pulse rate fell following hyoscine administration (9 beats min −1 , P <0.01). Skin conductance was reduced following hyoscine compared with zamifenacin or placebo ( P <0.001). Conclusions These results suggest that compounds with selective M 3 and/or m5 antagonism possess activity against motion sickness. Antagonism at these receptors may be the basis of the anti‐motion sickness action of hyoscine.