Premium
Population pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine monotherapy in patients with epilepsy: retrospective analysis of routine monitoring data
Author(s) -
Hussein Z.,
Posner J.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
british journal of clinical pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.216
H-Index - 146
eISSN - 1365-2125
pISSN - 0306-5251
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1997.00594.x
Subject(s) - lamotrigine , nonmem , pharmacokinetics , medicine , population , volume of distribution , epilepsy , therapeutic drug monitoring , population pharmacokinetics , gastroenterology , environmental health , psychiatry
Aims To examine the population pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine in patients newly diagnosed with epilepsy and receiving oral lamotrigine monotherapy for up to 48 weeks. Methods The population consisted of 158 Caucasians and 5 Asians of whom 81 were males and 82 females. Age and weight ranged between 14 and 76 years and 41–107 kg, respectively. A one‐compartment compartment model with first‐order absorption and elimination was fitted to plasma lamotrigine concentration‐time profiles from retrospective drug monitoring, using non‐linear mixed effect modelling (NONMEM), with first‐order estimation. Oral clearance (CL o ), apparent volume of distribution ( V / F ) and absorption rate constant ( K a ) were the main pharmacokinetic parameters. Results CL o was not significantly influenced by body weight, age, gender, oral contraceptives and dose. However, due to auto‐induction CL o increased by 17.3% during the 48 weeks of therapy, from 1.94 to 2.28 l h −1 , and was 28.7% lower in Asians than Caucasian. The final magnitude in interpatient variability was 32%. The effect of the covariates weight, age, race and gender on V / F was examined and none was statistically significant. The final population estimate of V / F was 77.4 l with an interpatient variability of 34%. Conclusions In view of the wide therapeutic margin of lamotrigine and the 21% residual variability in plasma concentrations, the modest significant effects of race and auto‐induction on clearance are unlikely to be clinically significant and, thus, no dosage adjustment is warranted for these effects.