Premium
Larval growth of turbot, Scophthalmus maximus (L.) produced with fresh and cryopreserved sperm
Author(s) -
Chereguini O,
De La Banda I G,
Rasines I,
Fernandez A
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
aquaculture research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.646
H-Index - 89
eISSN - 1365-2109
pISSN - 1355-557X
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2109.2001.00541.x
Subject(s) - turbot , biology , scophthalmus , sperm , hatching , human fertilization , larva , cryopreservation , artificial fertilization , reproduction , zoology , andrology , ecology , anatomy , fishery , botany , embryo , fish <actinopterygii> , medicine
The present paper assesses the fertilization and hatching rates, as well as the growth, of larvae obtained from four artificial fertilizations (AF) using fresh and cryopreserved sperm of the turbot Scophthalmus maximus (L.). Larvae growth in both sperm groups, measured in terms of length and weight at culture days 0, 7, 14 and 31, are compared, as well as their growth rates. The two groups' fertilization and hatching rates were not significantly different. Likewise, no significant differences in length and wet weight of 7‐ and 14‐day‐old larvae were found using fresh and cryopreserved sperm; however, significant differences were found in 31‐day‐old larvae, which were more attributable to the variability inherent in larval turbot culture, and to variability in the reproductive specimens used in our study, than to the type of sperm employed. These results indicate that the type of sperm used in artificial fertilization, i.e. fresh or cryopreserved, is not a determining factor, either for fertilization and hatching, or for subsequent larval development. Our results also confirm once again the high quality of cryopreserved turbot sperm, and its usefulness in commercial hatcheries.