Premium
Leakage of fluid around high‐volume, low‐pressure cuffs
Author(s) -
Asai T.,
Shingu K.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
anaesthesia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.839
H-Index - 117
eISSN - 1365-2044
pISSN - 0003-2409
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01718.x
Subject(s) - mallinckrodt , cuff , medicine , tracheal tube , leak , anesthesia , tidal volume , intubation , tube (container) , airway , surgery , respiratory system , anatomy , materials science , composite material , family medicine , environmental engineering , engineering
We studied the ability of high‐volume, low‐pressure tracheal tube cuffs (Portex Soft Seal®, Portex Profile®, Mallinckrodt Lo‐Contour® and Mallinckrodt Hi‐Lo® tubes) to prevent leakage of fluid into the airway, in a model trachea and lung. Five tubes (7.0 and 8.0 mm internal diameter) of each type were used. Each tube was inserted into the model trachea and the cuff inflated until the intracuff pressure reached either 20, 30 or 40 cmH 2 O. The model lung was ventilated with a tidal volume of 700 ml and respiratory rate of 14 breath.min −1 at a compliance of 20 cmH 2 O. Ten millilitres of 0.01% methylene blue solution were infused over the cuff and the volume of fluid leaking past the cuff over 5 min was measured. The leak volume for the Soft Seal tube was less than that for the Profile or Lo‐Contour tubes at all intracuff pressures (all p < 0.05). Compared with the Hi‐Lo tube, the volume leaking past the cuff for the Soft Seal tube was greater at an intracuff pressure of 20 cmH 2 O (p < 0.05), whereas there was no significant difference between these two tubes at an intracuff pressure of 30 or 40 cmH 2 O. We conclude that the cuff of the Portex Soft Seal tube prevented leakage of fluid significantly more than that of the Portex Profile or Mallinckrodt Lo‐Contour tubes, and to a similar degree to that of the Mallinckrodt Hi‐Lo tube.