Premium
An independent assessment of a supraregional pain management programme and comparison of patients' and general practitioners' perceptions of the effects
Author(s) -
Gupta S.,
Francis J. D.,
Porter G. E.,
Valentine J. M. J.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
anaesthesia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.839
H-Index - 117
eISSN - 1365-2044
pISSN - 0003-2409
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01126.x
Subject(s) - medicine , quality of life (healthcare) , general practice , physical therapy , family medicine , health care , independence (probability theory) , medline , pain management , perception , nursing , mathematics , neuroscience , statistics , political science , law , economics , biology , economic growth
This study was designed to evaluate the therapeutic response, as perceived by patients and their general practitioners, to a supraregional residential pain management programme (INPUT). Twenty patients who completed the INPUT programme and their general practitioners, were sent locally designed questionnaires. Eighteen patients and 16 general practitioners responded. Patients were assessed for the effects of the programme on a wide variety of treatment targets reflecting quality of life. General practitioners were questioned about changes in dependence upon healthcare services. The mean time from attending INPUT to assessment was 11.4 (5.7) months. Thirteen patients indicated a moderate or maximal improvement in quality of life. General practitioners reported a reduced use of healthcare services and improvement in quality of life. The majority of our patients attending INPUT gained benefits that improved their quality of life. Healthcare services appeared to benefit from the patients' greater independence in managing their symptoms.