Removing chest drains – a critical reflection of a complex clinical decision

Summary • Decision‐making is a fundamental element of nursing work (Boblin‐Cummings et al ., 1999; Berggren and Severinsson, 2000; Bucknall, 2000) which fluctuates according to experience, location and personal boundaries • Nursing judgements are said to portray the nature of nursing knowledge and practice (Thompson, 1999; Buckingham and Adams, 2000a) and can affect others either favourably or adversely (Gordon et al ., 1994), with Buckingham and Adams (2000a) emphasizing the benefits to be gained from understanding the process, including improved clinical effectiveness and self‐knowledge • It is said that all decisions are made in one of two ways – hypothetico‐deductively or intuitively (Dowie and Elstein, 1988; Thompson, 1999; Buckingham and Adams, 2000a) – although different titles are used interchangeably for the same modes. Both of these modalities are examined • Hypothetico‐deductive reasoning entails exposure to information before and during the patient encounter. These data are grouped and used to generate a hypothesis or possible diagnosis • The second stance in decision‐making is founded upon intuition and closely associated with expertise • The presence of chest drains after cardiothoracic surgery is known to cause severe pain, thereby interfering with respiratory mechanics and the ability to take part in physiotherapy exercises (Owen and Gould, 1997; Fox et al ., 1999; Charnock and Evans, 2001; Lazzara, 2002) • This work therefore aims to examine the decision‐making processes in relation to the prompt removal of chest drains by analysing the options available and the skills required to utilize them effectively