Premium
Quality assurance in mental health‐care: a case study from social work
Author(s) -
Ring Christopher
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
health and social care in the community
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.984
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1365-2524
pISSN - 0966-0410
DOI - 10.1046/j.0966-0410.2001.00324.x
Subject(s) - action plan , mental health , quality assurance , quality policy , social work , government (linguistics) , multidisciplinary approach , quality (philosophy) , context (archaeology) , quality management , process management , action (physics) , public relations , work (physics) , health care , psychology , nursing , applied psychology , business , service (business) , medicine , engineering , marketing , political science , management , psychiatry , philosophy , law , linguistics , biology , paleontology , epistemology , quantum mechanics , mechanical engineering , physics , economics
The quality of health and social care is now a high priority for government, professionals, and the public. This is particularly true of mental health, where explicit standards lie at the centre of current policy, demanding the development of reliable means for quality assurance. These need to allow for the multiplicity of stakeholders in mental health‐care, and their different constructions of ‘quality’. The challenges presented are illustrated by this account of an action research programme, which was developed to improve social work practice in a multidisciplinary mental health service, and evaluated using a case study design. An action research approach was chosen in preference to an ‘off‐the‐shelf’ quality assurance system, because it possessed features that appeared to match the context of the work. It involved feeding back the findings of a baseline assessment of service quality to four teams of social workers, who used the information to select priority areas for improvement. An action plan was developed with them, and its implementation and impact were examined. Substantial improvements were observed in only one of the chosen target areas – the quality of case recording. For the other – securing the clients’ full involvement in their care plan – very limited improvements occurred. Interview data suggested that this was due to the presence of extensive organisational support for the first objective, but not the second. These findings suggest that while some features of action research can contribute to quality improvement, these must be incorporated into a more comprehensive programme of change, which commands the support of all the stakeholders involved.