Premium
Signal detection in amplitude‐modulated maskers. II. Processing in the songbird's auditory forebrain
Author(s) -
Nieder Andreas,
Klump Georg M.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
european journal of neuroscience
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.346
H-Index - 206
eISSN - 1460-9568
pISSN - 0953-816X
DOI - 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01465.x
Subject(s) - masking (illustration) , noise (video) , forebrain , acoustics , population , songbird , envelope (radar) , physics , excitatory postsynaptic potential , amplitude , auditory system , psychology , neuroscience , computer science , inhibitory postsynaptic potential , biology , telecommunications , artificial intelligence , art , paleontology , radar , image (mathematics) , quantum mechanics , visual arts , central nervous system , demography , sociology
In the natural environment, acoustic signals have to be detected in ubiquitous background noise. Temporal fluctuations of background noise can be exploited by the auditory system to enhance signal detection, especially if spectral masking components are coherently amplitude modulated across several auditory channels (a phenomenon called ‘comodulation masking release’). In this study of neuronal mechanisms of masking release in the primary auditory forebrain (field L) of awake European starlings ( Sturnus vulgaris ), we determined and compared neural detection thresholds for 20‐ms probe tones presented in a background of sinusoidally amplitude modulated (10‐Hz) noise maskers. Responses of a total of 34 multiunit clusters were recorded via radiotelemetry with chronically implanted microelectrodes from unrestrained birds. For maskers consisting of a single noise band centred around the recording site's characteristic frequency, a substantial reduction in detection threshold (21 dB on average) was found when probe tones were presented during envelope dips rather than during envelope peaks. Such effects could also explain results obtained for masking protocols where the on‐frequency noise band was presented together with excitatory or inhibitory flanking bands that were either coherently modulated (in‐phase) or incoherently modulated (phase‐shifted). Generally, masking release for probe tones in maskers with flanking bands extending beyond the frequency range of a cell cluster's excitatory tuning curve was not substantially improved. Only some of the neurophysiological results are in agreement with behavioural data from the same species if only the average population response is considered. A subsample of individual neurons, however, could account for behavioural thresholds.