Premium
Phenotypic plasticity of body size in Drosophila : effects of a daily periodicity of growth temperature in two sibling species
Author(s) -
Pétavy Georges,
Moreteau Brigitte,
Gibert Patricia,
Morin JeanPhilippe,
David Jean R.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
physiological entomology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.693
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1365-3032
pISSN - 0307-6962
DOI - 10.1046/j.0307-6962.2001.00255.x
Subject(s) - wing , biology , phenotypic plasticity , thorax (insect anatomy) , wing loading , drosophila melanogaster , zoology , anatomy , ecology , genetics , thermodynamics , physics , angle of attack , gene , aerodynamics
. Variation of wing and thorax length under thermoperiodic growth conditions was analysed in four strains of two sibling species, Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans , from two European localities. Results were compared to those obtained with constant temperatures ranging from 12 to 31 °C. Under constant temperatures the data basically confirmed previous results: concave reaction norms for wing and thorax length; a monotonically decreasing norm for wing : thorax ratio; and an increasing norm for sex dimorphism (female : male ratio). Phenotypic variability was maximum at extreme temperatures and minimum at middle ones. Slight differences were observed according to the geographical origin: the difference between strains from Bordeaux (France) and Cordoba (Spain) was maximum at low temperatures but disappeared at about 28 °C. According to the temperatures chosen, alternating thermal regimens had either no effect or produced a significant size reduction, probably reflecting a periodic stress. The magnitude of this effect was proportional to the amplitude of the thermoperiod but not to the quality (cold or heat) of the stress. In a similar way, the wing : thorax ratio was either not modified or reduced significantly, indicating that wing length was relatively more affected than thorax length by alternating thermal regimens. Sex dimorphism also showed either no change or a significant increase, indicating that males were relatively more reactive than females to alternating conditions. Finally, regimens of broad amplitudes increased the phenotypic variability, again an indication of stressful effects. All these observations should be taken into account when analysing phenotypic variability in nature and trying to understand natural selection in wild‐living populations.