Premium
Plasma concentrations of haloperidol are related to CYP2D6 genotype at low, but not high doses of haloperidol in Korean schizophrenic patients
Author(s) -
Roh HyungKeun,
Chung JeaYon,
Oh DongYul,
Park ChangShin,
Svensson JanOlof,
Dahl MarjaLiisa,
Bertilsson Leif
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
british journal of clinical pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.216
H-Index - 146
eISSN - 1365-2125
pISSN - 0306-5251
DOI - 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01437.x
Subject(s) - haloperidol , cyp2d6 , genotype , dopamine antagonist , medicine , pharmacokinetics , pharmacology , analysis of variance , endocrinology , chemistry , cytochrome p450 , metabolism , dopamine , biochemistry , gene
Aims This study was carried out to evaluate the influence of CYP2D6 genotype on the steady state plasma concentrations of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol in Korean schizophrenic patients. Methods One hundred and twenty Korean schizophrenic patients treated with various, clinically determined, doses of haloperidol (range 3–60, median 20 mg day −1 ) during monotherapy were recruited. CYP2D6 genotypes were determined by analysis of the CYP2D6 * 10 allele using allele‐specific PCR and the CYP2D6 * 5 allele by long‐PCR. Steady state plasma concentrations of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol were analysed by h.p.l.c. Results Twenty‐three (19.2%), 60 (50.0%), 1 (0.8%), 33 (27.5%) and 3 patients (2.5%) possessed the CYP2D6 genotypes * 1/ * 1 , * 1/ * 10 , * 1/ * 5 , * 10/ * 10 and * 10/ * 5 , respectively. The allele frequencies of CYP2D6 * 1 , * 10 and * 5 were 44.6%, 53.8% and 1.7%, respectively. Significant relationships between dose and plasma concentrations of haloperidol (linear; r 2 = 0.60, P < 0.0001) and reduced haloperidol (quadratic equation; r 2 = 0.67) were observed. Overall, the concentrations normalized for dose (C/D) of haloperidol were significantly different between the CYP2D6 * 1/ * 1 , * 1/ * 10 and * 10/ * 10 genotype groups (one‐way anova ; P = 0.028). No significant differences between the genotype groups were found with respect to the C/D of reduced haloperidol ( P = 0.755). However, in patients with daily doses less than 20 mg, significant differences in the C/D of haloperidol ( P = 0.003), but not of reduced haloperidol, were found between the three major genotype groups. In patients with doses higher than 20 mg, no differences were found between the genotype groups for either haloperidol or reduced haloperidol. 68 patients (57%) used benztropine, an antimuscarinic agent. All four patients with a * 5 allele (one together with * 1 and three with * 10 ) were found to use benztropine. The patients homozygous for the * 1 allele seemed to need less benztropine than the patients with one or two mutated alleles (Fisher's exact test; P = 0.036). Conclusions The dose‐corrected steady state plasma concentrations of haloperidol, but not of reduced haloperidol, were significantly different between the CYP2D6*1/*1 , *1/*10 and *10/*10 genotype groups when doses lower than 20 mg haloperidol were given. No differences were found at higher doses. These results suggest the involvement of CYP2D6 in the metabolism of haloperidol at low doses of haloperidol (< 20 mg daily), while another enzyme, probably CYP3A4, contributes at higher doses.