Premium
The effects of steady‐state erythromycin and azithromycin on the pharmacokinetics of sildenafil in healthy volunteers
Author(s) -
Muirhead Gary J.,
Faulkner Stephen,
Harness Jane A.,
Taubel Jörg
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
british journal of clinical pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.216
H-Index - 146
eISSN - 1365-2125
pISSN - 0306-5251
DOI - 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.00031.x
Subject(s) - sildenafil , pharmacokinetics , erythromycin , medicine , tolerability , azithromycin , placebo , pharmacology , oral administration , dosing , cmax , adverse effect , antibiotics , chemistry , biochemistry , alternative medicine , pathology
Aims Sildenafil, an effective oral treatment for erectile dysfunction, is predominantly metabolized by the cytochrome P450 isozyme 3A4, which is inhibited by a number of the macrolide antibiotics. Therefore, two placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group studies were conducted to evaluate the effects of multiple doses of erythromycin and azithromycin on the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of a single oral 100‐mg dose of sildenafil. Methods In the erythromycin interaction study, 26 male volunteers (18–45 years of age) received open‐label sildenafil 100 mg on day 1. Half received blinded erythromycin (500 mg) twice daily on days 2–6, and the other half received placebo. On day 6, all subjects received a second 100‐mg dose of sildenafil. In the azithromycin interaction study, 24 male volunteers (19–33 years of age) received open‐label 100 mg sildenafil on day 1. Half then received blinded azithromycin (500 mg) once daily on days 2–4, and the other half received placebo. On day 4, all subjects received another 100‐mg dose of sildenafil. In both studies, blood samples were collected on the first and last study day for the analysis of plasma concentrations of sildenafil and its primary metabolite, UK‐103,320. Results Repeated dosing with erythromycin caused statistically significant increases in the AUC and C max of sildenafil (2.8‐fold and 2.6‐fold, respectively) but had no effect on T max , k el or t 1/2 . A statistically significant 1.4‐fold increase in the AUC of UK‐103,320 was also observed, as well as a significant decrease in k el , resulting in an increase of about 1 h in t 1/2 . In contrast, repeated dosing with azithromycin caused no significant change in any pharmacokinetic parameter of either sildenafil or UK‐103,320. Erythromycin, azithromycin and sildenafil were well tolerated; adverse events were mild and transient. No subject withdrew from either trial for any reason related to study drug. Conclusions These results indicate that erythromycin modifies the pharmacokinetics of sildenafil by inhibiting its CYP3A4‐mediated first‐pass metabolism. Given these data, a lower starting dose of sildenafil (25 mg) may be considered for patients receiving erythromycin or other potent CYP3A4 inhibitors. Azithromycin did not affect the pharmacokinetics of sildenafil; therefore, no adjustment in dosage is necessary for patients receiving these drugs concomitantly.