Premium
Interactive effects of drought and shade on three arid zone chenopod shrubs with contrasting distributions in relation to tree canopies
Author(s) -
Prider J. N.,
Facelli J. M.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
functional ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.272
H-Index - 154
eISSN - 1365-2435
pISSN - 0269-8463
DOI - 10.1046/j.0269-8463.2004.00810.x
Subject(s) - shading , biology , arid , shade tolerance , atriplex , water use efficiency , stomatal conductance , transpiration , botany , water content , drought tolerance , water use , shoot , agronomy , photosynthesis , ecology , canopy , art , geotechnical engineering , engineering , visual arts
Summary1 Plants that grow beneath trees in arid systems may frequently experience both water and light limitation, although protection from high radiation loads during drought may compensate for a loss of productivity due to reduced light availability when water is plentiful. 2 We examined the effects of shading, during an imposed water deficit, on the carbon gain, stomatal conductance ( g s ) and shoot water potential (Ψ s ) of seedlings of three shrubs: Atriplex vesicaria (Heward ex Benth.), a C 4 species, and Enchylaena tomentosa (R. Br.) and Rhagodia spinescens (R. Br.), which are restricted to shaded sites beneath trees. 3 Under conditions of limiting water, photosynthetic rates measured at saturating light ( A max ) were negative in high‐light grown Enchylaena plants but remained positive in shade‐grown plants. When water was not limiting, A max was reduced in shade‐grown Atriplex but shade did not affect carbon gain in the other two species. 4 Atriplex Ψ s was higher in shaded than in unshaded plants, but in unshaded plants positive carbon gain was maintained at Ψ s below −10 MPa. Stomatal conductance and A max decreased more slowly with increasing water deficit in shaded conditions in all species. 5 Atriplex was tolerant of a broader range of light and soil moisture conditions than Enchylaena , with Rhagodia intermediate between these two species. The interactive effect between drought and shade and the ecophysiological tolerances of these three species have consequences for their field distributions.