Premium
Monoterpene emissions in relation to foliar photosynthetic and structural variables in Mediterranean evergreen Quercus species
Author(s) -
Niinemets Ülo,
Hauff Karin,
Bertin Nadia,
Tenhunen John D.,
Steinbrecher Rainer,
Seufert Günther
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
new phytologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.742
H-Index - 244
eISSN - 1469-8137
pISSN - 0028-646X
DOI - 10.1046/j.0028-646x.2001.00323.x
Subject(s) - monoterpene , photosynthesis , evergreen , botany , canopy , phenology , rubisco , chemistry , horticulture , biology
Summary• The relationships between foliar photosynthetic variables and monoterpene emission rates ( E ) are reported here for two sclerophylls, Quercus coccifera L. and Q. ilex L., which lack specialized foliar monoterpene‐storage structures. • Photosynthesis rates and E were measured within a forest canopy, and in leaves of different exposure in a garrigue ecosystem. Leaf dry mass per unit area (LMA) was used as a proxy of long‐term leaf light availability. • Maximum photosynthetic electron transport rate ( J max ), Rubisco carboxylase activity ( V cmax ) and light‐saturated E ( E max ) per unit area increased strongly with increasing LMA. The positive effect of LMA on area‐based E max resulted from an accumulation of enzymes responsible for monoterpenoid synthesis per unit area. Positive relationships were observed between both area‐ and mass‐based E max and J max , but not with photosynthesis rates, suggesting a possible control of terpene synthesis by foliar electron transport rates. Results suggested that monoterpene volatility limitations at low temperatures might also constrain E . Nonspecific storage may explain bursts of monoterpene emission on warm days following cold days, and monoterpene emission in low quantities during night. • Although the correlations between E max and J max do not necessarily give mechanistic insight into the physiology of monoterpene emission, they provide a basis for scaling up leaf emissions to a canopy level. However, both the leaf‐to‐leaf differences in monoterpene synthase activities, and monoterpene storage may perplex the relations between the electron transport rates and E .