Premium
Crown architecture of Populus spp. is differentially modified by free‐air CO 2 enrichment (POPFACE)
Author(s) -
Gielen B.,
Calfapietra C.,
Claus A.,
Sabatti M.,
Ceulemans R.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
new phytologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.742
H-Index - 244
eISSN - 1469-8137
pISSN - 0028-646X
DOI - 10.1046/j.0028-646x.2001.00301.x
Subject(s) - canopy , crown (dentistry) , competition (biology) , botany , productivity , woody plant , biology , branching (polymer chemistry) , ecology , horticulture , environmental science , atmospheric sciences , chemistry , medicine , macroeconomics , dentistry , organic chemistry , economics , geology
Summary• Although canopy architecture is a prime determinant of forest functioning and productivity, it has received little attention when examining forest responses to rising atmospheric CO 2 concentrations. In this study different characteristics of crown architecture of two Populus species and one hybrid were investigated within a high‐density poplar plantation. A free‐air CO 2 enrichment (FACE) facility was used to mimic future elevated CO 2 concentrations. • Canopy depth and branching patterns were studied, and detailed branch characteristics such as branch dimension, inclination, and internodal length were assessed for the three poplar species in the FACE and control treatments. • Effects of elevated CO 2 were restricted to a significantly increased canopy depth and longer internodal lengths after two years of CO 2 enrichment. Additionally, branch dimensions and sylleptic branch numbers were increased by FACE, but responses were variable among growing seasons and species. However, FACE did not affect branch angles of origin and termination. • Crown architecture was modified mainly through a growth stimulation in response to FACE. Nevertheless, important differences among species were observed which may influence future CO 2 responses when competition will become more important.