z-logo
Premium
Foliar dehydration tolerance of mycorrhizal cowpea, soybean and bush bean
Author(s) -
Augé Robert M.,
Kubikova Elena,
Moore Jennifer L.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
new phytologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.742
H-Index - 244
eISSN - 1469-8137
pISSN - 0028-646X
DOI - 10.1046/j.0028-646x.2001.00187.x
Subject(s) - symbiosis , agronomy , phosphorus , biology , dehydration , water potential , drought tolerance , glomus , human fertilization , soil water , botany , chemistry , spore , ecology , bacteria , biochemistry , genetics , organic chemistry
Summary•  Foliar dehydration tolerance of three mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal legumes is presented here. •  Leaf water potential, osmotic adjustment and soil matric potential at the end of a lethal drying episode were compared in soybean, cowpea and bush bean colonized or uncolonized by Glomus intraradices . •  Lethal leaf water potential were similar among treatments except in soybean, for which nonmycorrhizal plants given low phosphorus fertilization had values 0.3–0.4 MPa lower than mycorrhizal plants or nonmycorrhizal plants given higher phosphorus fertilization. Mycorrhizal symbiosis did not affect osmotic adjustment or lethal soil matric potential. Nonmycorrhizal cowpeas given low phosphorus showed more osmotic adjustment than nonmycorrhizal cowpeas given higher phosphorus. Foliage of host species typically classified as drought avoiders, cowpea and bush bean, survived to lower soil matric potentials than soybean, although soybean foliage was more tolerant of dehydration. •  Our findings support the idea that when arbuscular mycorrhizal plants fare better than nonmycorrhizal plants during drought, it is probably due to enhanced drought avoidance capabilities conferred by the symbiosis rather than to changes in ability of foliage to withstand dehydration.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here