Premium
Social organization of cooperatively breeding long‐tailed tits: kinship and spatial dynamics
Author(s) -
Hatchwell B. J.,
Anderson C.,
Ross D. J.,
Fowlie M. K.,
Blackwell P. G.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
journal of animal ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.134
H-Index - 157
eISSN - 1365-2656
pISSN - 0021-8790
DOI - 10.1046/j.0021-8790.2001.00541.x
Subject(s) - flock , kinship , biology , spatial dispersion , home range , range (aeronautics) , nest (protein structural motif) , polygyny , population , geography , demography , ecology , biochemistry , physics , materials science , optics , sociology , habitat , political science , law , composite material
Summary1 Long‐tailed tits Aegithalos caudatus L. are cooperative breeders in which breeders that have failed in their own breeding attempt become helpers at the nest of relatives. We investigated the effects of kinship on the spatial dynamics of non‐breeding flocks of long‐tailed tits in order to determine the information available on the kinship of other members of the population from their use of home ranges. 2 A novel method of home range analysis was devised based on ‘convex hull peeling’. This method takes into account the dispersion of all fixes within a home range and permits the quantitative analysis of home range use. In addition, the method allows the extent of overlap between adjacent home ranges to be determined and the use of those areas to be investigated. 3 Non‐breeding flocks of long‐tailed tits were composed mainly of relatives, but also included unrelated immigrants. Flock ranges were large and there was extensive overlap between adjacent flocks. 4 The degree of range overlap was significantly affected by the relatedness of flocks. If two flocks contained close relatives they were more likely to overlap than two flocks containing non‐relatives. Moreover, the amount of overlap was significantly greater for two adjacent related flocks than for two adjacent unrelated flocks. 5 The use of overlapping areas of non‐breeding ranges of long‐tailed tit flocks was also influenced significantly by relatedness. Overlapping flocks that were unrelated to each other usually avoided areas of overlap, while related flocks did not generally show such avoidance behaviour. 6 Kinship has significant effects on the spatial dynamics of non‐breeding flocks of long‐tailed tits and therefore flock behaviour can provide information on the relatedness of other members of the population that might be important for helping decisions in this cooperatively breeding species.