z-logo
Premium
Prospective ranking of the sonographic markers for aneuploidy: Data of 2143 prenatal cytogenetic diagnoses referred for abnormalities on ultrasound
Author(s) -
Daniel Art,
Athayde Neil,
Ogle Robert,
George Alice M.,
Michael Jonathan,
Pertile Mark d,
Bryan Jennifer,
Jammu Vapinder,
Trudinger Brian J.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
australian and new zealand journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.734
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1479-828X
pISSN - 0004-8666
DOI - 10.1046/j.0004-8666.2003.00025.x
Subject(s) - medicine , aneuploidy , ventriculomegaly , cystic hygroma , anencephaly , single umbilical artery , spina bifida , obstetrics , prenatal diagnosis , chromosome abnormality , omphalocele , ultrasound , nuchal translucency measurement , pregnancy , fetus , radiology , karyotype , chromosome , pediatrics , biology , genetics , gene
Abstract Objective: To design a scheme to rank sonographic anomalies as indicators of aneuploidy and record the distribution of data from 2143 prenatal amniotic fluid/chorionic villous sample diagnoses referred for karyotyping because of fetal anomalies detected with ultrasound. Methods: In all cases the records of sonographic anomalies were obtained prior to karyotyping. A cascade of seven prospective categories of ultrasound anomalies was chosen and the data were included in the highest compatible sonography category. The categories were in descending order: (I) combined central nervous system (CNS)/cranial shape and cardiac anomalies (excluding spina bifida and anencephaly); (II) key anomaly present (exomphalos/intrauterine growth restriction/duodenal atresia/cystic hygroma/fetal hydrops/talipes – with other multiple anomalies); (III) CNS ± other abnormality (excluding choroid plexus cyst, spina bifida, anencephaly); (IVa) increased nuchal translucency – first trimester ± other abnormality; (IVb) increased nuchal thickening – second trimester ± other abnormality; (V) cardiac anomaly ± other abnormality; (VI) other markers of aneuploidy (pyelectasis/two vessel cord/echogenic bowel/short femur); and (VII) other (mostly isolated) malformations. Results: There were 412/2143 (19.2%) chromosome abnormalities detected in this sonographically abnormal group. Overall, the prevalence of aneuploidy significantly ranged from 51 to 3% according to the above I–VII ultrasound categories and from approximately 1–80% for individual ultrasound anomalies. Likelihood ratios were derived for many ultrasound anomalies for several aneuploidy groups: trisomies of 13; 18; and 21; 45,X and 45,X mosaics; triploidy; other autosomal duplications and/or deletions; and other (than 45,X) sex chromosomal aneuploidies. Conclusion: It is suggested this data could be used to assist pre‐procedural counselling of patients after the ultrasound scan in tertiary referral centres for prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here