
Calibration approaches for the measurement of aerosol multielemental concentration using spark emission spectroscopy
Author(s) -
Lina Zheng,
Pramod Kulkarni,
Dionysios D. Dionysiou
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of analytical atomic spectrometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.899
H-Index - 113
eISSN - 1364-5544
pISSN - 0267-9477
DOI - 10.1039/c7ja00252a
Subject(s) - aerosol , analytical chemistry (journal) , partial least squares regression , calibration , univariate , multivariate statistics , chemistry , linear regression , mean squared error , mathematics , statistics , chromatography , organic chemistry
A multivariate calibration approach, using partial least squares regression, has been developed for measurement of aerosol elemental concentration. A training set consisting of 25 orthogonal aerosol samples with 9 factors (elements: Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb, Ti) and 5 levels (elemental concentrations) was designed. Spectral information was obtained for each aerosol sample using aerosol spark emission spectroscopy (ASES) at a time resolution of 1 minute. Simultaneous filter samples were collected for determination of elemental concentration using an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) analysis. Two regression models, PLS1 and PLS2, were developed to predict mass concentration from spectral measurements. Prediction ability of the models improved substantially when only signature wavelengths were included instead of the entire spectrum. The PLS1 model with 45 selected spectral variables (PLS1-45 model) presented the lowest relative root mean square error of cross validation (RMSECV; 16 - 35%). The detection limits using the PLS1-45 model, for the nine elements were in the range of 0.16 - 0.50 μg/m 3 . The performance of both multivariate and univariate regression models were tested for an unknown sample of welding fume aerosol. The multivariate model did not provide significantly better prediction compared to the univariate model. In spite of the difference in matrices of calibration aerosol and the unknown test aerosol, the results from PLS model show good agreement with those from filter measurements. The relative root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) obtained from PLS1-45 model was 13% for Cr, 23% for Fe, 22% for Mn and 12% for Ni. The study shows that in spite of lower spectral resolution and lack of sample preparation, reliable and robust measurements can be obtained using the proposed calibration method based on PLS regression.