Is an electric field always a promoter of wetting? Electro-dewetting of metals by electrolytes probed by in situ X-ray nanotomography
Author(s) -
Maryana I. Nave,
Yu Gu,
Yuchen Karen ChenWiegart,
Jun Wang,
Konstantin G. Kornev
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
faraday discussions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.255
H-Index - 110
eISSN - 1364-5498
pISSN - 1359-6640
DOI - 10.1039/c6fd00239k
Subject(s) - electrowetting , wetting , contact angle , dewetting , electric field , electrolyte , tungsten , materials science , anodizing , surface tension , meniscus , nanotechnology , composite material , chemistry , metallurgy , optics , electrode , optoelectronics , aluminium , thermodynamics , physics , incidence (geometry) , quantum mechanics , dielectric
We developed a special electrochemical cell enabling quantitative analysis and in situ X-ray nanotomography of metal/electrolyte interfaces subject to corrosion. Using this cell and applying the nodoid model to describe menisci formed on tungsten wires during anodization, the evolution of the electrolyte surface tension, the concentration of reaction products, and the meniscus contact angle were studied. In contrast to the electrowetting effect, where the applied electric field decreases the contact angle of electrolytes, anodization of the tungsten wires increases the contact angle of the meniscus. Hence, an electric field favors dewetting rather than wetting of the newly formed surface. The discovered effect opens up new opportunities for the control of wetting phenomena and calls for the revision of existing theories of electrowetting.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom