Premium
Upregulation of MIP‐2 (CXCL2) expression by 15‐deoxy‐Δ 12,14 ‐prostaglandin J 2 in mouse peritoneal macrophages
Author(s) -
Kim Hyo Y,
Kim Hee S
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
immunology and cell biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.999
H-Index - 104
eISSN - 1440-1711
pISSN - 0818-9641
DOI - 10.1038/sj.icb.7100001
Subject(s) - downregulation and upregulation , cxcl2 , microbiology and biotechnology , chemistry , prostaglandin , prostaglandin e2 , prostaglandin e , cancer research , biology , biochemistry , gene , chemokine , endocrinology , receptor , chemokine receptor
A peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor γ (PPAR γ ) ligand, 15‐deoxy‐Δ 12,14 ‐prostaglandin J 2 (15d‐PGJ 2 ), has been reported to possess anti‐inflammatory activity in activated monocytes/macrophages. In this study, we investigated the effect of 15d‐PGJ 2 on the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)‐induced expression of chemokine mRNAs, especially macrophage inhibitory protein (MIP)‐2 (CXCL2), in mouse peritoneal macrophages. The inhibitory actions of the natural PPAR γ ligands, 15d‐PGJ 2 and prostaglandin A1 (PGA1), on the expression of RANTES (regulated upon activation, normal T expressed and secreted; CCL5), MIP‐1 β (CCL4), MIP‐1 α (CCL3), IFN‐ γ ‐inducible protein 10 kilodaltons (IP‐10; CXCL10) and monocyte chemoattractant protein‐1 (MCP‐1; CCL2) mRNA in LPS‐treated cells were stronger than those of the synthetic PPAR γ ligands troglitazone and ciglitazone. However, 15d‐PGJ 2 enhanced the expression of LPS‐induced MIP‐2 (CXCL2) mRNA. A specific PPAR γ antagonist (GW9662) had no effect on the inhibitory action of 15d‐PGJ 2 and PGA1 in LPS‐induced chemokine mRNA expression and on the synergistic action of 15d‐PGJ 2 in LPS‐induced MIP‐2 (CXCL2) expression. Moreover, LPS itself reduced the expression of PPAR γ . Although the synergistic effect of 15d‐PGJ 2 on LPS‐induced MIP‐2 (CXCL2) mRNA expression was remarkable, the production of MIP‐2 (CXCL2) in cells treated with 15d‐PGJ 2 and LPS did not increase compared to the production in cells treated with LPS alone. The synergistic action of 15d‐PGJ 2 on LPS‐induced MIP‐2 (CXCL2) mRNA expression was dependent on the activation of nuclear factor‐ κ B (NF‐ κ B), and 15d‐PGJ 2 increased the phosphorylation of p38 and stress‐activated protein kinase/c‐Jun N‐terminal kinase (SAPK/JNK) in cells stimulated with LPS. These results suggest that the synergistic effect of 15d‐PGJ 2 on LPS‐induced MIP‐2 (CXCL2) expression is PPAR γ ‐independent, and is mediated by the p38 and SAPK/JNK pathway in mitogen‐activated protein kinase signaling pathways, which activates NF‐ κ B. Our data may give more insights into the different mechanisms contrary to the anti‐inflammatory effect of 15d‐PGJ 2 on the expression of chemokine genes.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom