z-logo
Premium
How much can a T‐cell antigen receptor adapt to structurally distinct antigenic peptides?
Author(s) -
Mazza Catherine,
AuphanAnezin Nathalie,
Gregoire Claude,
Guimezanes Annick,
Kellenberger Christine,
Roussel Alain,
Kearney Alice,
van der Merwe P Anton,
SchmittVerhulst AnneMarie,
Malissen Bernard
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
the embo journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 7.484
H-Index - 392
eISSN - 1460-2075
pISSN - 0261-4189
DOI - 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601605
Subject(s) - t cell receptor , biology , major histocompatibility complex , degeneracy (biology) , antigen , mhc restriction , t cell , microbiology and biotechnology , effector , epitope , genetics , immune system
Binding degeneracy is thought to constitute a fundamental property of the T‐cell antigen receptor (TCR), yet its structural basis is poorly understood. We determined the crystal structure of a complex involving the BM3.3 TCR and a peptide (pBM8) bound to the H‐2K bm8 major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecule, and compared it with the structures of the BM3.3 TCR bound to H‐2K b molecules loaded with two peptides that had a minimal level of primary sequence identity with pBM8. Our findings provide a refined structural view of the basis of BM3.3 TCR cross‐reactivity and a structural explanation for the long‐standing paradox that a TCR antigen‐binding site can be both specific and degenerate. We also measured the thermodynamic features and biological penalties that incurred during cross‐recognition. Our data illustrate the difficulty for a given TCR in adapting to distinct peptide‐MHC surfaces while still maintaining affinities that result in functional in vivo responses. Therefore, when induction of protective effector T cells is used as the ultimate criteria for adaptive immunity, TCRs are probably much less degenerate than initially assumed.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here