z-logo
Premium
The eIF1A C‐terminal domain promotes initiation complex assembly, scanning and AUG selection in vivo
Author(s) -
Fekete Christie A,
Applefield Drew J,
Blakely Stephen A,
Shirokikh Nikolay,
Pestova Tatyana,
Lorsch Jon R,
Hinnebusch Alan G
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
the embo journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 7.484
H-Index - 392
eISSN - 1460-2075
pISSN - 0261-4189
DOI - 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600821
Subject(s) - library science , computer science
Translation initiation factor 1A stimulates 40S‐binding of the eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2)/GTP/Met‐tRNA i Met ternary complex (TC) and promotes scanning in vitro . eIF1A contains an OB‐fold present in bacterial IF1 plus N‐ and C‐terminal extensions. Truncating the C‐terminus (Δ C ) or mutating OB‐fold residues ( 66–70 ) of eIF1A reduced general translation in vivo but increased GCN4 translation (Gcd − phenotype) in a manner suppressed by overexpressing TC. Consistent with this, both mutations diminished 40S‐bound TC, eIF5 and eIF3 in vivo , and Δ C impaired TC recruitment in vitro . The assembly defects of the OB‐fold mutation can be attributed to reduced 40S‐binding of eIF1A, whereas Δ C impairs eIF1A function on the ribosome. A substitution in the C‐terminal helix ( 98 – 101 ) also reduced 43S assembly in vivo . Rather than producing a Gcd − phenotype, however, 98 – 101 impairs GCN4 derepression in a manner consistent with defective scanning by reinitiating ribosomes. Indeed, 98 – 101 allows formation of aberrant 48S complexes in vitro and increases utilization of non‐AUG codons in vivo . Thus, the OB‐fold is crucial for ribosome‐binding and the C‐terminal domain of eIF1A has eukaryotic‐specific functions in TC recruitment and scanning.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here