Premium
G‐protein‐coupled receptor heteromers: function and ligand pharmacology
Author(s) -
Franco R,
Casadó V,
Cortés A,
Mallol J,
Ciruela F,
Ferré S,
Lluis C,
Canela E I
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
british journal of pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.432
H-Index - 211
eISSN - 1476-5381
pISSN - 0007-1188
DOI - 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707571
Subject(s) - pharmacology , chemistry , g protein coupled receptor , function (biology) , receptor , neuroscience , computational biology , biology , microbiology and biotechnology , biochemistry
Almost all existing models for G‐protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) are based on the occurrence of monomers. Recent studies show that many GPCRs are dimers. Therefore for some receptors dimers and not monomers are the main species interacting with hormones/neurotransmitters/drugs. There are reasons for equivocal interpretations of the data fitting to receptor dimers assuming they are monomers. Fitting data using a dimer‐based model gives not only the equilibrium dissociation constants for high and low affinity binding to receptor dimers but also a ‘cooperativity index’ that reflects the molecular communication between monomers within the dimer. The dimer cooperativity index ( D C ) is a valuable tool that enables to interpret and quantify, for instance, the effect of allosteric regulators. For different receptors heteromerization confers a specific functional property for the receptor heteromer that can be considered as a ‘dimer fingerprint’. The occurrence of heteromers with different pharmacological and signalling properties opens a complete new field to search for novel drug targets useful to combat a variety of diseases and potentially with fewer side effects. Antagonists, which are quite common marketed drugs targeting GPCRs, display variable affinities when a given receptor is expressed with different heteromeric partners. This fact should be taken into account in the development of new drugs. British Journal of Pharmacology (2008) 153 , S90–S98; doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707571 ; published online 26 November 2007