Premium
Opposite diastereoselective activation of P2Y 1 and P2Y 11 nucleotide receptors by adenosine 5′‐O‐( α ‐boranotriphosphate) analogues
Author(s) -
Ecke D,
Tulapurkar M E,
Nahum V,
Fischer B,
Reiser G
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
british journal of pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.432
H-Index - 211
eISSN - 1476-5381
pISSN - 0007-1188
DOI - 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706887
Subject(s) - diastereomer , p2y receptor , receptor , nucleotide , stereochemistry , chemistry , p2 receptor , adenosine triphosphate , ligand (biochemistry) , biochemistry , purinergic receptor , gene
Background and purpose: We explored the stereoselective activation of the P2Y 11 receptor, stably expressed and tagged with GFP, in 1321N1 cells, in comparison to its closest homologue, the P2Y 1 receptor. Experimental approach: The potency of several chiral ATP analogues was determined by measuring increases in intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca 2+ ] i ). In a series of ATP‐ α ‐B and ATP‐ α ‐S analogues, a non‐bridging oxygen atom of P was substituted by BH 3 or sulphur, respectively, introducing a chiral center at P. The pairs of diastereoisomers (A and B isomers) were each applied as purified compounds. Key results: The (B) isomers (ATP‐ α ‐B Sp isomers and ATP‐ α ‐S Rp isomers) of all derivatives tested were more potent at the P2Y 11 receptor than the corresponding (A) isomers (ATP‐ α ‐B Rp isomers and ATP‐ α ‐S Sp isomers) and the parent compounds. This characteristic of the P2Y 11 receptor is opposite to the behaviour of the same diastereoisomers at the P2Y 1 receptor, at which the (A) isomers are more active. Conclusions and implications: The distinctly opposite diastereoselective activity of ATP derivatives at the P2Y 11 and the P2Y 1 receptor will allow the deciphering of structural differences of the ligand recognition sites between these receptor subtypes and may aid in the development of subtype‐selective agonists. Moreover, ATP‐ α ‐B diastereoisomers are not active at the P2Y 2 receptor. Thus, they are compounds suitable for distinguishing the functional contribution of the two ATP‐activated P2Y receptors, the P2Y 2 and P2Y 11 receptor, in physiological or pathophysiological responses of cells. British Journal of Pharmacology (2006) 149 , 416–423. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706887