z-logo
Premium
Differential activation of G‐proteins by μ ‐opioid receptor agonists
Author(s) -
Saidak Zuzana,
BlakePalmer Katherine,
Hay Debbie L,
Northup John K,
Glass Michelle
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
british journal of pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.432
H-Index - 211
eISSN - 1476-5381
pISSN - 0007-1188
DOI - 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706661
Subject(s) - opioid receptor , differential (mechanical device) , receptor , chemistry , opioid , neuroscience , pharmacology , medicine , biology , biochemistry , physics , thermodynamics
We investigated the ability of the activated μ ‐opioid receptor (MOR) to differentiate between myristoylated G α i1 and G α oA type G proteins, and the maximal activity of a range of synthetic and endogenous agonists to activate each G protein. Membranes from HEK293 cells stably expressing transfected MOR were chaotrope extracted to denature endogenous G‐proteins and reconstituted with specific purified G‐proteins. The G subunits were generated in bacteria and were demonstrated to be recognised equivalently to bovine brain purified G protein by CB 1 cannabinoid receptors. The ability of agonists to catalyse the MOR‐dependent GDP/[ 35 S]GTPS exchange was then compared for G α i1 and G α oA . Activation of MOR by DAMGO produced a high‐affinity saturable interaction for G α oA ( K m =20±1 n M ) but a low‐affinity interaction with G α i1 ( K m =116±12 n M ). DAMGO, met‐enkephalin and leucine‐enkephalin displayed maximal G activation among the agonists evaluated. Endomorphins 1 and 2, methadone and β ‐endorphin activated both G to more than 75% of the maximal response, whereas fentanyl partially activated both G‐proteins. Buprenorphine and morphine demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the maximal activities between G α i1 and G α oA . Interestingly, DAMGO, morphine, endomorphins 1 and 2, displayed significant differences in the potencies for the activation of the two G. Differences in maximal activity and potency, for G α i1 versus G α oA , are both indicative of agonist selective activation of G‐proteins in response to MOR activation. These findings may provide a starting point for the design of drugs that demonstrate greater selectivity between these two G‐proteins and therefore produce a more limited range of effects.British Journal of Pharmacology (2006) 147 , 671–680. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706661

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom