z-logo
Premium
Functional characterization and expression of endothelin receptors in rat carotid artery: involvement of nitric oxide, a vasodilator prostanoid and the opening of K + channels in ET B ‐induced relaxation
Author(s) -
Tirapelli Carlos R,
Casolari Debora A,
Yogi Alvaro,
Montezano Augusto C,
Tostes Rita C,
Legros Eurode,
D'OrléansJuste Pedro,
De Oliveira Ana M
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
british journal of pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.432
H-Index - 211
eISSN - 1476-5381
pISSN - 0007-1188
DOI - 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706388
Subject(s) - endothelium , receptor , endothelin receptor , vasoconstriction , vasodilation , agonist , endothelin 1 , chemistry , phenylephrine , contraction (grammar) , rhoa , medicine , vascular smooth muscle , endocrinology , nitric oxide , endothelins , biology , signal transduction , biochemistry , smooth muscle , blood pressure
We aimed to functionally characterize endothelin (ET) receptors in the rat carotid artery. mRNA and protein expressions of both ET A and ET B receptors, evaluated by reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) and Western immunoblotting, were detected in carotid segments. Immunohistochemical assays showed that ET B receptors are expressed in the endothelium and smooth muscle cells, while ET A receptors are expressed only in the smooth muscle cells. In endothelium‐denuded vessels, levels of ET B receptor mRNA were reduced. Vascular reactivity experiments, using standard muscle bath procedures, showed that ET‐1 induces contraction in endothelium‐intact and ‐denuded carotid rings in a concentration‐dependent manner. Endothelial removal enhanced ET‐1‐induced contraction. BQ123 and BQ788, selective antagonists for ET A and ET B receptors, respectively, produced concentration‐dependent rightward displacements of the ET‐1 concentration–response curves. IRL1620, a selective agonist for ET B receptors, induced a slight vasoconstriction that was abolished by BQ788, but not affected by BQ123. IRL1620‐induced contraction was augmented after endothelium removal. ET‐1 concentration dependently relaxed phenylephrine‐precontracted rings with intact endothelium. The relaxation was augmented in the presence of BQ123, reduced in the presence of BQ788 and completely abolished after endothelium removal. IRL1620 induced vasorelaxation that was abolished by BQ788 and endothelium removal, but not affected by BQ123. Preincubation of intact rings with N G ‐nitro‐ L ‐arginine methyl ester ( L ‐NAME), 1H‐[1,2,4]oxadiazolo[4,3‐a]quinoxalin‐1‐one (ODQ), indomethacin or tetraethylammonium (TEA) reduced IRL1620‐induced relaxation. The combination of L ‐NAME, indomethacin and TEA completely abolished IRL1620‐induced relaxation while sulfaphenazole did not affect this response. 4‐aminopyridine (4‐AP), but not apamin, glibenclamide or charybdotoxin, reduced IRL1620‐induced relaxation. The major finding of this work is that it firstly demonstrated functionally the existence of both ET A and ET B vasoconstrictor receptors located on the smooth muscle of rat carotid arteries and endothelial ET B receptors that mediated vasorelaxation via NO–cGMP pathway, vasodilator cyclooxygenase product(s) and the activation of voltage‐dependent K + channels.British Journal of Pharmacology (2005) 146 , 903–912. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706388

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here