z-logo
Premium
Insights into the functional roles of α 1 ‐adrenoceptor subtypes in mouse carotid arteries using knockout mice
Author(s) -
Deighan Clare,
Methven Laura,
Naghadeh Mustafa M,
Wokoma Alexis,
Macmillan Joyce,
Daly Craig J,
Tanoue Akito,
Tsujimoto Gozoh,
McGrath John C
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
british journal of pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.432
H-Index - 211
eISSN - 1476-5381
pISSN - 0007-1188
DOI - 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706089
Subject(s) - prazosin , endocrinology , phenylephrine , medicine , agonist , antagonist , chemistry , knockout mouse , urotensin ii , receptor , blood pressure
1 α 1 ‐Adrenoceptor (AR) subtypes in mouse carotid arteries were characterised using a combination of agonist/antagonist pharmacology and knockout (KO) mice. 2 Phenylephrine (PE) was most potent in the α 1B ‐KO (pEC 50 =6.9±0.2) followed by control (pEC 50 =6.3±0.06) and α 1D ‐KO (pEC 50 =5.5±0.07). Both N ‐[5‐(4,5‐dihydro‐1 H ‐imidazol‐2yl)‐2‐hydroxy‐5,6,7,8‐tetrahydronaphthalen‐1‐yl] methanesulphonamide hydrobromide (A‐61603) and 5‐hydroxytryptamine (5‐HT) were more potent in the α 1D ‐KO (pEC 50 =7.4±0.27 and 7.4±0.05, respectively) than the control (pEC 50 =6.9±0.09 and 6.9±0.08, respectively) and equipotent with the control in the α 1B ‐KO (pEC 50 =6.7±0.07 and 6.8±0.04). Maximum responses to PE and A‐61603 were reduced in the α 1D ‐KO compared to control; there was no difference in maximum responses to 5‐HT. 3 In control arteries, prazosin and 5‐methylurapidil acted competitively with p A 2 of 9.6 and 7.5, respectively. BMY7378 produced antagonism only at the highest concentration used (100 n M ; p K B 8.3). 4 Prazosin, 5‐methylurapidil and BMY7378 acted competitively in α 1B ‐KO carotid arteries with p A 2 of 10.3, 7.6 and 9.6, respectively. 5 In the α 1D ‐KO, against PE, 5‐methylurapidil produced a p A 2 of 8.1. p K B values were calculated for prazosin (10.6) and BMY7378 (7.0). Against A‐61603, 5‐methylurapidil had a p A 2 of 8.5, prazosin 8.6, while BMY7378 had no effect. 6 In conclusion, the α 1B ‐KO mediates contraction solely through α 1D ‐ARs and the α 1D ‐KO through α 1A ‐ARs. Extrapolating back to the control from the knockout data suggests that all three subtypes could be involved in the responses, but we propose that the α 1D ‐AR causes the contractile response and that the role of the α 1B ‐AR is mainly regulatory.British Journal of Pharmacology (2005) 144 , 558–565. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706089

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom