Premium
A model for receptor–peptide binding at the glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) receptor through the analysis of truncated ligands and receptors
Author(s) -
AlSabah Suleiman,
Donnelly Dan
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
british journal of pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.432
H-Index - 211
eISSN - 1476-5381
pISSN - 0007-1188
DOI - 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705453
Subject(s) - receptor , glucagon like peptide 1 receptor , peptide , enzyme linked receptor , transmembrane domain , biology , g protein coupled receptor , 5 ht5a receptor , biochemistry , chemistry , microbiology and biotechnology , biophysics , agonist
The receptor for glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) can be activated by both its physiological hormone and a peptide discovered in the venom of the Gila Monster, exendin‐4, which shows promise as an antidiabetic agent. Exendin‐4 displays receptor‐binding properties not observed for GLP‐1. Firstly, exendin‐4 can be truncated by up to eight residues at its N‐terminus without a significant loss of affinity. Secondly, exendin‐4 maintains high affinity for the isolated N‐terminal domain of the receptor, suggesting that exendin‐4 makes additional contacts with this domain of the receptor, which nullify the requirement for ligand–receptor interactions involving the extracellular loops and/or transmembrane helices of the receptor's core domain. In order to further understand the nature of the receptor–peptide interaction, a variety of full length and truncated peptide analogues were used to quantify the contribution of each distinct region of exendin‐4 and GLP‐1 to receptor affinity. Our data show that, for both exendin‐4 and GLP‐1, the primary interaction is between the putative helical region of the peptide and the extracellular N‐terminal domain of the receptor. However, we demonstrate that the contribution to receptor affinity provided by the N‐terminal segment of GLP‐1 is greater than that of exendin‐4, while the C‐terminal nine residue extension of exendin‐4, absent in GLP‐1, forms a compensatory interaction with the N‐terminal domain of the receptor. We describe a peptide–receptor binding model to account for these data.British Journal of Pharmacology (2003) 140 , 339–346. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705453