z-logo
Premium
Extracellular L ‐arginine is required for optimal NO synthesis by eNOS and iNOS in the rat mesenteric artery wall
Author(s) -
MacKenzie Andrew,
Wadsworth Roger M
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
british journal of pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.432
H-Index - 211
eISSN - 1476-5381
pISSN - 0007-1188
DOI - 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705380
Subject(s) - enos , arginine , nitric oxide synthase , nitric oxide , extracellular , endothelium , carbachol , medicine , endocrinology , superoxide , biochemistry , chemistry , omega n methylarginine , nitroarginine , biology , stimulation , amino acid , enzyme
The formation of NO from endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) in rat superior mesenteric artery rings was dependent on extracellular L ‐arginine, and was optimal at a concentration of L ‐arginine close to the plasma level (carbachol‐stimulated NO: control 15.7±0.9, L ‐arginine 100 μ M 22.8±1.3 n M ). Enhancement of NO output by L ‐arginine was stereospecific, required the cationic amino‐acid transporter and was dependent on caveolin. Induction of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) impaired the stimulated NO synthesis from eNOS (100 n M carbachol‐stimulated NO: control 5.7±0.6, iNOS 0.3±0.3 n M ). The interaction between iNOS and eNOS was reversed by the superoxide scavenger MnTMPyP. Impairment of eNOS by iNOS was also prevented by L ‐arginine 100 μ M administered simultaneously with carbachol, but not by L ‐arginine administered during incubation with lipopolysaccharide. These data provide functional evidence that supplementing L ‐arginine from the extracellular medium optimises the formation of NO from eNOS and suggests that the impairment of eNOS by iNOS is caused by excess formation of superoxide by NO synthase, which can be prevented by L ‐arginine. These results provide an explanation for the observations that extracellular L ‐arginine can enhance endothelium function only when the endothelium is impaired or when iNOS has been induced.British Journal of Pharmacology (2003) 139 , 1487–1497. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705380

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here