z-logo
Premium
Mutations inducing divergent shifts of constitutive activity reveal different modes of binding among catecholamine analogues to the β 2 ‐adrenergic receptor
Author(s) -
Carmine Renata Del,
Ambrosio Caterina,
Sbraccia Maria,
Cotecchia Susanna,
Ijzerman Adriaan P,
Costa Tommaso
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
british journal of pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.432
H-Index - 211
eISSN - 1476-5381
pISSN - 0007-1188
DOI - 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704622
Subject(s) - ligand (biochemistry) , chemistry , mutant , stereochemistry , alanine , receptor , intrinsic activity , binding site , adenylyl cyclase , biophysics , biochemistry , biology , agonist , amino acid , gene
We compared the changes in binding energy generated by two mutations that shift in divergent directions the constitutive activity of the human β 2 adrenergic receptor (β 2 AR). A constitutively activating mutant (CAM) and the double alanine replacement (AA mutant) of catechol‐binding serines (S204A, S207A) in helix 5 were stably expressed in CHO cell lines, and used to measure the binding affinities of more than 40 adrenergic ligands. Moreover, the efficacy of the same group of compounds was determined as intrinsic activity for maximal adenylyl cyclase stimulation in wild‐type β 2 AR. Although the two mutations had opposite effects on ligand affinity, the extents of change were in both cases largely correlated with the degree of ligand efficacy. This was particularly evident if the extra loss of binding energy due to hydrogen bond deletion in the AA mutant was taken into account. Thus the data demonstrate that there is an overall linkage between the configuration of the binding pocket and the intrinsic equilibrium between active and inactive receptor forms. We also found that AA mutation‐induced affinity changes for catecholamine congeners gradually lacking ethanolamine substituents were linearly correlated to the loss of affinity that such modifications of the ligand cause for wild‐type receptor. This indicates that the strength of bonds between catechol ring and helix 5 is critically dependent on the rest of interactions of the β‐ethanolamine tail with other residues of the β 2 ‐AR binding pocket.British Journal of Pharmacology (2002) 135 , 1715–1722; doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704622

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here