Premium
Angiotensin II reduces infarct size and has no effect on post‐ischaemic contractile dysfunction in isolated rat hearts
Author(s) -
Ford William R,
Clanachan Alexander S,
Robin Hiley C,
Jugdutt Bodh I
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
british journal of pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.432
H-Index - 211
eISSN - 1476-5381
pISSN - 0007-1188
DOI - 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704225
Subject(s) - angiotensin ii , medicine , perfusion , cardiology , ischemia , renin–angiotensin system , chemistry , endocrinology , blood pressure
In order to test the hypothesis that angiotensin II exacerbates myocardial ischaemia‐reperfusion (IR) injury, we examined the effects of graded angiotension II concentrations of angiotensin II on IR injury in both working and non‐working (Langendorff) isolated rat hearts. Non‐working hearts were subjected to 30 min aerobic perfusion (baseline) then 25 min of global, no‐flow ischaemia followed by 30 min of reperfusion either in the absence (control, n =7) or presence of 1 ( n =6) or 10 n M ( n =5) angiotensin II). Recoveries of LV developed pressure and coronary flow after 30 min reperfusion in control hearts (58±9 and 40±8% of baseline levels, respectively) were no different from hearts treated with 1 or 10 n M angiotensin II. Infarct size (determined at the end of reperfusion by triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining) was reduced by angiotensin II in a concentration‐dependent manner (from a control value of 27±3 to 18±4% and 9±3% of the LV, respectively). Working hearts were subjected to 50 min pre‐ischaemic (pre‐I) aerobic perfusion then 30 min of global, no‐flow ischaemia followed by 30 min of reperfusion either in the absence (control, n =14) or presence of 1 ( n =8), 10 ( n =7) or 100 n M ( n =7) angiotensin II). In controls, post‐ischaemic (post‐I) left ventricular (LV) work and efficiency of oxygen consumption were depressed (43±9 and 42±10% of pre‐I levels, respectively). The presence of angiotensin II throughout IR had no effect on LV work compared with control. Thus, angiotensin II reduces infarct size in a concentration‐dependent manner but has no effect on contractile stunning associated with IR in isolated rat hearts.British Journal of Pharmacology (2001) 134 , 38–45; doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704225