z-logo
Premium
Differential effects of chronic drug treatment on α3 * and α7 nicotinic receptor binding sites, in hippocampal neurones and SH‐SY5Y cells
Author(s) -
Ridley Diana L,
Rogers Adrian,
Wonnacott Susan
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
british journal of pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.432
H-Index - 211
eISSN - 1476-5381
pISSN - 0007-1188
DOI - 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704207
Subject(s) - epibatidine , methyllycaconitine , nicotinic agonist , chemistry , nicotine , alpha 4 beta 2 nicotinic receptor , downregulation and upregulation , pharmacology , binding site , nicotinic antagonist , population , ganglion type nicotinic receptor , endocrinology , receptor , nicotinic acetylcholine receptor , biochemistry , biology , medicine , environmental health , gene
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of chronic treatment (for 4 or 7 days) with nicotinic drugs and 20 m M KCl on numbers of surface α7 nicotinic AChR, identified by [ 125 I]‐α bungarotoxin (α‐Bgt) binding, in primary hippocampal cultures and SH‐SY5Y cells. Numbers of α3 * nicotinic AChR were also examined in SH‐SY5Y cells, using [ 3 H]‐epibatidine, which is predicted to label the total cellular population of predominantly α3β2 * nicotinic AChR under the conditions used. All the nicotinic agonists examined, the antagonists d‐tubocurarine and methyllycaconitine, and KCl, upregulated [ 125 I]‐α Bgt binding sites by 20–60% in hippocampal neurones and, where examined, SH‐SY5Y cells. Upregulation of [ 125 I]‐α‐Bgt binding sites by KCl was prevented by co‐incubation with the L‐type Ca 2+ channel blocker verapamil or the Ca 2+ ‐calmodulin dependent kinase II (CaM‐kinase II) inhibitor KN‐62. Upregulation of [ 125 I]‐α‐Bgt binding sites by nicotine or 3,[(4‐dimethylamino) cinnamylidene] anabaseine maleate (DMAC) was insensitive to these agents. [ 3 H]‐Epibatidine binding sites in SH‐SY5Y cells were not affected by KCl but were upregulated in a verapamil‐insensitive manner by nicotine and DMAC. KN‐62 itself provoked a 2 fold increase in [ 3 H]‐epibatidine binding. The inactive analogue KN‐04 had no effect, suggesting that CaM‐kinase II plays a role in regulating numbers of α3 * nicotinic AChR. These data indicate that numbers of α3 * and α7 nicotinic AChR are modulated differently. Nicotinic agonists and KCl upregulate α7 nicotinic AChR through distinct cellular mechanisms, the latter involving L‐type Ca 2+ channels and CaM‐kinase II. In contrast, α3 * nicotinic AChR are not upregulated by KCl. This difference may reflect the distinct physiological roles proposed for α7 nicotinic AChR.British Journal of Pharmacology (2001) 133 , 1286–1295; doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704207

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom