Premium
Lysosphingolipid receptor‐mediated diuresis and natriuresis in anaesthetized rats
Author(s) -
Bischoff Angela,
Heringdorf Dagmar Meyer zu,
Jakobs Karl H,
Michel Martin C
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
british journal of pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.432
H-Index - 211
eISSN - 1476-5381
pISSN - 0007-1188
DOI - 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703969
Subject(s) - kaliuresis , natriuresis , diuresis , endocrinology , medicine , vasoconstriction , renal blood flow , chemistry , renovascular hypertension , renal function , kidney
Lysosphingolipids such as sphingosine‐1‐phosphate (SPP) and sphingosylphosphorylcholine (SPPC) can act on specific G‐protein‐coupled receptors. Since SPP and SPPC cause renal vasoconstriction, we have investigated their effects on urine and electrolyte excretion in anaesthetized rats. Infusion of SPP (1 – 30 μg kg −1 min −1 ) for up to 120 min dose‐dependently but transiently (peak after 15 min, disappearance after 60 min) reduced renal blood flow without altering endogenous creatinine clearance. Nevertheless, infusion of SPP increased diuresis, natriuresis and calciuresis and, to a lesser extent, kaliuresis. These tubular lysosphingolipid effects developed more slowly (maximum after 60 – 90 min) and also abated more slowly upon lysosphingolipid washout than the renovascular effects. Infusion of SPPC, sphingosine and glucopsychosine (3 – 30 μg kg −1 min −1 each) caused little if any alterations in renal blood flow but also increased diuresis, natriuresis and calciuresis and, to a lesser extent, kaliuresis. Pretreatment with pertussis toxin (10 μg kg −1 3 days before the acute experiment) abolished the renovascular and tubular effects of 30 μg kg −1 min −1 SPP. These findings suggest that lysosphingolipids are a hitherto unrecognized class of endogenous modulators of renal function. SPP affects renovascular tone and tubular function via receptors coupled to G i ‐type G‐proteins. SPPC, sphingosine and glucopsychosine mimic only the tubular effects of SPP, and hence may act on distinct sites.British Journal of Pharmacology (2001) 132 , 1925–1933; doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703969